You’re standing there, telling your neighbor “at least I didn’t pick a child killer!”

The part where you abstained from helping your neighbor, and the 9 additional children, etc.

What’s the theory?

Is it possible for those needs to be met systematically without some kind of coercion?

Reading the article, the conclusions seem to line up with what I experience. Namely the part where it says that individual users found a productivity boost.

At my company, we have a bunch of AI based tools set up, and it’s impressive how much of the time consuming, boring, burnout-inducing gruntwork I can offload to the robots, and instead spend more of my working hours working on things I actually want to work on.

And we also deploy things like AI search for internal knowledge bases. Being able to quickly get the information you need to complete your job, especially if that information is related to sales is definitely good for business, but I’m not even sure how you’d measure that in terms of “profit”.

What part are you confused about?

Yet they’ve never needed to commission power plants to dedicate power to these facilities.

Never?

No you’re right, they built the first one, all the demand that could ever be needed is covered by it, and there’s no reason to ever build any more.

It does if you consider that they are actually building them to support power usage of datacenters. And that datacenters are used for a lot more than just AI training.

I wonder how many people clutching their pearls over this also eat meat…

All of that adds to the energy costs

But do you actually know how much that is? Or are you just assuming it’s a lot.

Because demand for data centers is rising, with AI as just one of many reasons.

But that’s not as flashy as telling people it takes the energy of a small country to make a picture of a cat.

Also interesting that we’re ignoring something here – big tech is chasing cheap sources of clean energy. Don’t we want cheap, clean energy?

Right, so you don’t give a fuck about your neighbor. Stop pretending you do, and just admit you want to let bad people burn down the system and think your perfect ideology will rise from the ashes. If your neighbor gets stabbed, and babies start dying at an accelerated rate, so be it.

Just. Own. It.

You’re given 2 and only 2 options:

Option 1 - Every day:

• A child is killed

Option 2 - Every day:

• 10 children are killed
• 5 puppies are set on file
• Your neighbor gets stabbed
• One item of your personal property is stolen from you

You have to pick either one of these options, or abstain and let someone you don’t like pick for you instead.

You’re standing there, telling your neighbor “at least I didn’t pick a child killer!”

Voting for Kamala was what needed to be done to change the outcome.

Fine as in, when considering that either Kamala or Trump would be president, you don’t care which one got in, and the results we’re seeing would be the same either way.

The people on the call do…

LMAO you’re really doubling down?

No, they absolutely will not notice a 30ms delay. Why would you even say something so absurd?

And so, you’re fine with what’s happening under Trump. Yes, we get it.

Just own that, and stop weasling.

Of course you don’t, just pointing out how pathetic you are 🙂

Define, “sucks”

Weirdly, it kinda was…