🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

  • 30 Posts
  • 1.86K Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 20th, 2024

help-circle








  • Of course it came from a chinese lab. Simpky apply Arkham’s Razor.

    From a city where they happened to be studying the gain of function of corona viruses. A bunch of scientists who worked at said lab who where raising concerns about covid disappeared. Us aussies pushed for an independent assessment by the WHO and as a result china fucked with our ore trading, out wine trading, and held live lobsters on a tarmac in chinese heat for 6hours. All news sources that are pro china didnt even entertain the idea that it could be china. Said lab where the virus alleged leaked was investigated prior and found to have extreme negligence. For a virus to successfully make the zooinotic jump it needs to symultaniously gain the ability to infect and to spread (very unlikely) we are currently witnessing h5n1 attempting this jump and it had had many many failed attempted so far this was not witnessed for covid.

    I aint saying it was definatly a leak just that the odds that it iant are more extreme than if it was. And if it was its more likly to be from negligence than malice.

    “Never attribute to malice that which is adequatSimplyplained by ignorance”

    — Robert J. Hanlon (Hanlon’s Razor)







  • Here is the explanation for beef:

    Tldr: cows in sheds eating corn is the problem, cows eating natural grass actually sequester more carbon than an empty field.

    Long answer: Photosynthesis can only get carbon from the atmosphere. This carbon is then turned into plant material in grass. This grass is then eaten by the cow. A small portion of this grass will be converted into methane and other byproducts in the cow’s digestive tracks. Some will be turned to energy for the cow and a vast majority will be shit out as raw unprocessed material. This raw unprocessed material, i.e. cow shit, this will last in the environment sequestering more carbon for longer time than just grass sitting there by itself. A grazed paddock will grow more grass than a non-grazed paddock because the cows are eating the fucking grass. i.e. more carbon from the environment is getting sequestered in the grass and the cow shit.

    The only reason that cows get such a bad wrap is that variouse other factors are being counted that really shouldnt be under cows. Deforestation to grow plants to feed livestock, the transportation of meat, livestock feed etc etc.

    A properly managed grass fed beef (like what we have here in australia) actually has a net negative effect on ghg. The factory farmed beef eating corn in a shed thats never seen a blade of grass is whats actually causing the ghg seen in the reports.

    We have already seen this narrarive been used to strongarm small farmers grazing cattle while the multinational farms get away with fucking the environment cos they can afford the cost of beurocracy.

    We are all just 3 warm meals away from anarchy thats something we should do well to remember.