• 4 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 11th, 2024

help-circle


  • Obama won in a landslide. The democrats owned both houses.

    People at the time really thought Obama would be on the the side of the people- not the rich. I mean, come on, he was our first black president; you would have thought he would at least be on the side of the blacks.

    If he had been, then Bernie wouldn’t have been such a sensation. If he had been, and Hillary was like, “Obama and the DNC has anointed me his successor, and I will continue to do all the great things he has done,” Bernie wouldn’t have existed. Bernie was the message that Obama had actually failed. Flint was real.

    Anyway. If Trump has one Lieberman senator stopping him from getting some signature item, you can bet that their meeting isn’t going to end with that signature item being scuttled, it’s going to be that Lieberman would be afraid he’ll lose everything.

    Trump is extreme, but Obama could have made the final push. Same with our black torture rendition site.

    For me, seeing Obama is cringe. I wonder if that viewpoint is radical. I mean, Obama is a saint when compared to Trump, but…

    Perhaps I am unjustified.



  • As far as the first part of your response: Hmm, that’s interesting.

    As far as the, “Bruh, do you not remember…”

    Yes, I remember how Obamacare was passed.

    Do you you remember how it seemed like a public option should pass- it had a ton of support- people were rallying behind it.

    And then DroopyDog Senator Lieberman had that touted “meeting with Obama” and the public option was scuttled.

    From the moment that happened, I thought, “Lieberman’s the fall guy. The democrats don’t want the public option, and Obama isn’t any different from everyone else before him.” (think Flint, think Guantanamo, think Bank bailouts, think Bank Bailouts again). If Obama had wanted it, he could have done it. I mean, look at Trump. He didn’t.

    At the time I was furious with Lieberman and Obama- now, just Obama.

    https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2009-dec-15-la-naw-health-senate16-2009dec16-story.html





  • It’s “basically that.” But it’s not “actually that.”

    A public option would provide necessary health care at zero cost. Without regard to your income. Without regard to your job.

    This creates a situation, where if you earn a little bit more, you get “taxed” a lot. And quite frankly, sometimes it’s better to earn less and get healthcare than to earn more and lose it.

    Also, I’m under the impression, and could be wrong about this, but I believe NYC gets the funding for the NYC state of health from the federal government. So it can be held as ransom, by bullies like Adams or Trump.

    I’m suggesting that NYC should do an actual public option not using federal money. Instead binding together with other states to increase leverage and lower costs.





  • I was going to reply to: lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works. - but couldn’t because of the removing by the mod, so I’ll post it here:


    I’m not sure about this. Because if the Democrats are winning by large margins, it means they are in some way either representing the will of the people, or providing a viable alternative.

    The reason I want a “Tax the Rich” party is because the Democrats are not representing my will or providing a viable alternative to the Republicans. I personally believe, that if the billionaires were taxed out of existence, and the to 10% were taxed to never become a billionaire, the entire nation would be function better, no matter where you are on the political spectrum.

    I also believe that most people see the excess of Musk and realize that his abilities to control military assets (Starlink), to influence our government, and to live, seemingly outside of the law and any consequences of any of his actions - I believe they see this excess and understand he should not exist.

    I have no faith the democrats will perform any required changes, even if they won the mid terms in a landslide. Nor do I believe they want to, I believe they are all rich.








  • Maybe the real problem is the AI slop, which is really just humans being lazy.

    In my immediate neighborhood there are two pastry bakeries. One has lines of people summoned by the TikTok/Instagram, who take videos of themselves eating. The other is known to locals, but never self promotes.

    You can imagine, that the non-promoting one has amazing pastries. The best I’ve ever had. The TikTok one does have a trendy fancy interior, made for videos.

    People want to be seen at a pastry place. That fake pastry place wants to be seen as an awesome bakery, even though really, without the marketing they are below average. Some guy wants to be seen as writing pop music, even though he can’t. Another wants to draw, even though I won’t spend the thousands of hours required.

    Art is really about understanding the effort. Human effort.

    Somehow, I can just imagine having AI slop music, and AI slop movies, and AI slop everything.

    If a movie house is going to be Steve Jobs Pixar, they are going to hire the best real artists and the best real writers, and do something that means something to be human. They aren’t interested in slop.

    If a movie house is going to be just for profit, are they going to even pay for the generative AI to do a few more iterations. I think they will keep it at slop.

    Anyhow, a bit too much babble. Must sleep.