pronouns: she/her
i don’t see the problem with this tweet (assuming that it’s true, which feel free to correct me if it’s not)
a very cursory search shows Rage Against the War Machine is a Libertarian Party event, which means at best right-wing libertarians and more likely outright fascists who are cynically using calls for liberty to immiserate and oppress minorities. good on the PSL for attacking them.
he has been doing the maga communism grift for several years now, and recently thrown in with the “American Communist Party” along with Infrared and Midwestern Marx. literal nazbol shit
have you met many quants? a large number of them are like that, in much the same way that crypto currency people are (in fact, i think the crypto people are like that because they are poorly copying the quants).
usually the bits here are somewhat over the top, but this is a very modest proposal.
i’m so tired of libs (especially “leftists”) saying things like this are a win, or even that this is a “pretty significant shift in the status quo” (literally quoting one of them) because they might consider restricting arm transfers. another one i saw mentioned potential domestic military raids as a reason not to vote for Trump. the american left is fucking cooked. willing to vote for a genocide to save themselves is pure cowardice.
the process, in brief, goes something like this:
this can be very frustrating to begin with, but after a few tries you will start to see some improvement, and maybe even something you actually like.
yeah, i do
unfotunately, you have once again overestimated the morons. i know at least one who responded to this with “she’s being quoted out of context”.
this is how you get no-call/no-shows
the lead dev has gone on the record that using singular they in the documentation is putting politics into his project, so i expect it to be possibly technically interesting (emphasis on possibly), but no effort put into accessibility and with a fucking horrendous dev community.
i think the way they want it to be understood is “if elected, i will so thoroughly address all of the issues you care about that you don’t have to vote on them again”, which is kind of reasonable until you try working out how that would happen
clearly foreign adversaries are trying to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids
i know at one point they were quite proud to have a federal (DHS i think?) cybersecurity department on there. like, there was an announcement. this was a couple years ago, so i guess stuff may have changed since then, but i don’t trust like that.
infosec dot exchange. they gleefully welcomed feds on there
in a week he’ll be talking about how the woke communists tried to kill him and we need to return the favor to them
from what that link says, it sounds like the rule was made mostly to get around employers saying “this part of your paycheck is a bonus, not a wage, so it’s exempt from the time and a half rule”
so, start with:
x = 0.999…
now multiply each side by 10
10x = 9.9999…
now we subtract x from the left side, and 0.999… from the right, which is fine because they are equal:
9x = 9
and from there it should be fairly obvious that x is also equal to 1, which means 0.999… is also equal to 1
and the time necessary to dig into a bunch of dubious claims by a politician who is likely lying to you is beyond what’s reasonable for a person working a full-time job with a family or anything vaguely resembling a social life