deleted by creator

the question was rhetorical, but also thank you for the links! <3

i am not surprised that they are all this dumb: it takes an especially stupid person to decide “yes, i am fine allowing this machine to speak for me”. even more so when it’s made clear that the machine is a stochastic parrot trained via exploitation of the global south and massive amounts of plagiarism and that it also cooks the planet

i bought some bullshit from amazon and left a somewhat pretty mean review because debugging it was super frustrating

the seller reached out and offered a refund, so i told them basically “no, it’s ok, just address the concerns in my review. let me update my review to be less mean-spirited — i was pretty frustrated setting it up but it mostly works fine”

then they sent a message that had the “llm vibe”, and the rest of the conversation went

Seller: You’re right — we occasionally use LLM assistance for responses, but every message is reviewed to ensure accuracy and relevance to your concerns. We sincerely apologize if our previous replies dissatisfied you; this was our oversight.

Me: I am not simply dissatisfied. I will no longer communicate with your company and will update my review to note that you sent me synthetic text without my consent. Please do not reply to this message.

Seller: All our replies are genuine human-to-human communication with you, without using any synthetic text. It’s possible our communication style gave you a different impression. We aim to better communicate with you and absolutely did not intend any offense. With every customer, we maintain a conscientious and responsible attitude in our communications.

Me: “we occasionally use LLM assistance for responses”
“without using any synthetic text”
pick one

are all promptfondlers this fucking dumb?

is it cynical that i find the idea of a “latent space” a bit goofy? may just be because i think data science is kind of a joke and much machine learning is “we threw shit at our model but don’t know what a category error is”

like it’s just dimensionality reduction with new vocab?

colonise the light cone by exploring latent space

Can someone explain what this is referring to? I don’t understand it.

Breaking free from the butthole

is this the best thing i’ve ever read?

<3

i am an android user, but in the us not having an iphone can be tedious, so i set up openbubbles

did y’all know that apple lets its users create emojis with “AI” and these things come through as images to non-iphones?

thought i was past the “apple users incidentally harass non-apple users through imessage” thing, but this shit makes me want to just tell everyone that i will only answer messages on signal messenger

Thank you for the expression of sympathy. The good news is I actually love computer science, it fucking rules.

Also, I recorded this professor screaming at me and have documented all the plagiarism. I am waiting to officially leave the university to file a formal complaint. He may not get in any real trouble (universities will always go to bat for abusive researchers as long as they bring in grant money), but news will get out eventually.

So when I see people using LLMs to create things instead of doing it themselves, I can’t relate. Why do that when you can get the pleasure from doing it yourself? I guess if making money is the primary motivating factor, then it makes sense. But for me it is totally self-defeating.

I have a theory (similar to that “it’s been vibe coding all along” post) that it’s a combination of wishful thinking, lack of knowledge of real science, and a lack of any liberal arts skills, that altogether produces this farce.

I think it’s a good explanation for “the code has been battle tested because it’s so old and widely used, if it had bugs/security issues, we would have discovered them by now”, as well as the widespread “we invented a tech solution that is just a worse engineering solution”. Looking at you, chain of self-driving cars.

The reason I do CS is because a professor of computer science lied to me about the kind of work I’d be doing to get me to enroll in the CS PhD program instead of math. Guy later physically threatened me in his office and plagiarized my work, but I’m not sure if this reflects poorly on computer scientists, academics, or CS professors.

Anyway I have a chip on my shoulder.

the students in my cs department are overwhelmingly promptfondlers and even my strong students are doing the “qualified praise” thing.

fuck me why did i go into computer science

i thought it was pretty funny <3

Firefox appears to support tab groups^[1] if you’d like to try it.

If you’re a big dork like me and don’t like installing extensions, you can use Tab Groups in Chrome (or any Chromium-based browser). I save groups as sort of temp (ephemeral if I want to impress promptfondlers) bookmarks categorized by whatever miscellaneous stuff.

You can close the group and every tab will reopen when you open the group. When you delete all the tabs, the group is removed from the top of the browser window.

thinking about how often code will be like

[-1] * len(array) # -1 is a place holder because I don't know the vocabulary term "sentinel value"

and justified because “it just needs to work”

and now we have professional vibe coders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anguish

half as good as expert human

60% of what a senior can do

is there like a character sheet somewhere so i can know where i fall on this developer spectrum

fn silly is what it is

the closest i’ve ever come to being an idea guy is saying ‘yeah, i have ideas, they are [shit them out explicitly]. they are half-baked at best but let me know if you do anything with it’

coming up with ideas is fucking easy, for example:

pick a (palatable) villain from anything
put them in a setting that is banal but unusual for them
write jokes

BAM

Number magic?

they use numerology.ai as a backend

“we encode shit as numbers in an arbitrary way and then copy-paste it into chatgpt”