Insane indeed
Insane indeed
In Fake Korea, and in countries in Americas sphere of influence demonizing the DPRK is a profitable endeavor due to the country’s isolation, sparing economic and geopolitical repercussions. Similar to the Kpop industry, the perpetuation of fake news about the DPRK is a crucial element in maintaining Fake Korea’s existence. This practice thrives on belittling and demonizing the DPRK, showcasing how the production of false narratives serves as a valuable enterprise within the context of Fake Korea’s operations
Yeah we get it, you don’t want to accept even in passing that US’s enemy countries are not as bad as them.
Bernie radicalized me.
Please stop criticizing any state until you have the power to abolish it.
This is hilarious
Bow about 2 parties?
Why the downvotes ?. Is it because the red army is not shown as redfash army???
Communists that you find on internet are not just 13 year olds from america, there is a world out there you libs/conservatives from americkkka. It is really funny you guys still make this joke. Communists comes in different age, colour, from different countries. It is not a phase in the life of rebellious children from your country. So please don’t come here to infantilize us.
That OP is hilarious.
I never watched his streams btw. Hakim is my only habibi.
No one mentioned our second habibi, HasanAbi🤤. What Iam seeing is more like stochastic forms of learning among people which lackes centre public figures. I do not think this is bad but moving forward figures who can put theory in to practice should emerge and it will.
This is a old post saved from reddit.
USSR AND LGBT
Contrary to popular belief,the USSR did not have any anti-LGBTQ laws.
Article 121 was designed as an anti-pederasty law. If you look at the law text,it mentions or at least implies pedophilia.
To quote The Sangha kommune:
Article 121, despite its curious reading, appears to have been designed to protect Soviet society from the menace of child abuse and paedophilia, although it is recorded that Soviet academia was interested in the practice of homosexuality from a medical perspective, and attempting to ascertain its root cause (with a number of early Soviet researchers following the Czarist assumption of aberration). This did not mean that homosexuals were persecuted – far from it – the general underlying trend in the USSR was to end all oppression, and facilitate the integration of the individual into the collective.
https://thesanghakommune.org/2016/12/28/the-ussr-and-homosexuality-article-21/
Stalin himself wasn’t homophobic either, Georgy Chicherin,a known Homosexual Bolshevik,was a close Comrade of Stalin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgy_Chicherin
At one point, Chicherin announced that he wanted improved relations with foreign countries to encourage investment,this policy was enthusiastically supported by Joseph Stalin,and he said this:
“it can hardly be doubted that Comrade Chicherin is better informed about the mood in foreign investment circles that any of us” - J.V Stalin
Reiman, Michal: Birth of Stalinism, pp. 39-40 John Holroyd-Doveton Maxim Litvinov p 99
There’s no evidence that Stalin was homophobic in any Russian language text
https://thesanghakommune.org/2017/07/07/on-why-stalin-was-not-a-homophobe/
There’s no objective, verifiable evidence of a persecution of homosexuals in the USSR
To quote Sangha Kommune again:
Research By Adrian Chan-Wyles PhD
The fact that the Soviet Union was considered enlightened and tolerant demonstrates that these laws were not applied as a deliberate attack upon homosexuals – although in the 1930’s, certain homosexual activity became associated with specific counter-revolutionary activity. In this regard, homosexuals who strove to bring-down the USSR were treated as ‘criminals’ – just as their heterosexual colleagues. Soviet records demonstrate that Joseph Stalin… was responding to various police reports about contemporary counter-revolutionary activities (usually within major cities). ACW 5.1.2016
Modern (capitalist) Russia has now imported much of the anti-Soviet Cold War disinformation fabricated by the US (and her allies) between 1945 – 1991. As a result, many modern Russian authors side with the reactionary forces of capitalism and adopt this pseudo-history as their own (apparently not realising its ‘racist’ anti-Slavic nature). The above article is anti-Soviet and is designed to give the impression that the USSR carried-out a continued pogrom against homosexuals – even though its author continuously states that there is no evidence to support his claims. Indeed, the only evidence the author can muster is ‘Western’ Cold War authors whose work – as pieces of official fiction – contain no Russian language sources. However, I have quoted this piece where I have been able to verify the facts within Russian language sources. It remains informative on two counts, 1) as a narrative history of homosexuality in Russia from early times to present, and 2) as a study of modern (Russian) anti-Soviet literature. I have found no objective, verifiable evidence of a deliberate persecution of homosexuals in the USSR. ACW 29.10.2018
https://thesanghakommune.org/2017/01/05/the-ussr-and-homosexuality-part-iii-rsfsr-article-154a/
Hope this helps.
On here white MLs from US is against Patsoc when white MLs from mostly European countries are in favour of Patsocs, hummm I wonder why??? There are Patsocs like Haz who is arab. This is crazy.
Marx was a antistatist. Lenin and Stalin distorted marx’s ideas. Marx is more of a anarchist than a communist.
A famous leftist youtuber. (Im obviously paraphrasing)
People often claim that socialism is complex, and when attempts are made to implement it, they criticize these attempts for not following the theory correctly. However, the reality is that a system as complex as transitioning to a new system is inherently difficult and complex.
The idealism and dogma of left communists resemble the temper tantrums of children. They demand that socialism be served in the precise form they envision, like ice cream in a cone instead of a cup, or purchased from a specific vendor like an ice cream truck. They fail to recognize that obtaining the desired outcome may require adaptations, such as buying it from a supermarket, even if it takes a bit more time.
In the end, the left communists’ rigid adherence to their vision, regardless of practical considerations, is akin to a child’s tantrum over minor details. They lose sight of the bigger picture and the challenges inherent in creating a new social and economic system. Flexibility, nuance, and a willingness to learn from experience are essential for the successful implementation of socialist ideals.