First of all the judgment by their peers is something that is a pretext to the exclusion of women’s rights , second thing is we have 16 recognized groups of which only seven will have the right to create their own courts basically, 3rd is that in Iraq there is a lot of intermarriage between different sects which means that this law will effectively lead to not only societal sectarianism but interfamily sectarianism as we have seen in 2006

I’m frind

nothing is

I killed myself Infront of a crowd made of me , then I proceeded to eat my heart after which I celebrated the death by saying they are lucky, they are free ( I was in the crowd)

Because he protected trans ppl ? He didn’t so no you don’t have to vote for Genocide Joe

In my pov no , no union can have a future by focusing on a sect , for unions to function there is a need for cooperation between unions in different sectors

State and rev.

No need for improvement

Will do

I might do a go fund me but I still hasitate

no, by definition they are unhuman in such way that they do not deserve anything from the society that they have harmed.

And let me say this for you to be living in the West is for you to not understand the reasons behind such statements, in the end of the day you have not been genocided nor ethnically cleansed nor puts in present for five years and been tortured in such manner that makes you feel as if you are unhuman to them, after an experience like that you will get out and you are necessarily gain a be looking at yourself as a lesser as unhuman , the reason for these actions is two fold, first is to show you that your oppressors the actual humans the ables of doing harm and good to you her as much of human as you are, and the second is to make you understand that there will be no more oppression, that you will not exist in a world that does not avenge you, and that’s the point, dehumanizing them would bring about in the eyes of their victims justice fairness and satisfaction of mind that they would not be harmed again and their enemies go unharmed

if it will lead to the ppl fealing satisfide and that they have taken reveng then be it

What you don’t need to have a torturer you just need to put Hillary Clinton in Baghdad for three days and she will die from torture because we will kill her, and you say that because for you all you have experienced from capitalism is exploitation from the capitalist class, for others they saw their friends and family members getting exploded in to bits, you don’t really need to avenge for anything really but for me I will never be satisfied until we can actually harm those who have harmed us, same goes for the logic of October the 7th to an extent

Will again you are stepping at the point the point is that he justice in torturing and killing them is that it would bring satisfaction to those that they harmed

I can easily explain to you why torture, and it’s basically because it with alleviate the feelings for those who have been wronged, when Saddam got murdered by the American state people were not satisfied they needed him to suffer as much as they have suffered which is in the eyes of those who have suffered Justice enough. Ignoring the victims just because you can moralize from a far away place how they should act is not material thinking, you again sadly moralize the wrongness that have been inflicted upon people and them wanting to wrong them back, you would say I want Elon Musk and Jeff bezos to work in a factory or a genitarial job, that is you taking a revenge upon them from the same kind of wrongness they have wronged you

kut

its the uranium in the water