Has anyone else read “Ministry for the Future,” by Kim Stanley Robinson? It is depressingly realistic.
Has anyone else read “Ministry for the Future,” by Kim Stanley Robinson? It is depressingly realistic.
It’s like turning off your radio so you can read the map better.
Gotta go big screen for big purchases.
That’s how I feel about Neuromancer and most other cyberpunk books.
I love the addition of Snow Crash. I never see SF books in free libraries.
Edit: And Charles De Lint! You never see him these days. Kick ass free library, OP
check the title, smarty pants
“Be wary of spiteful Reddit users” is not instructions for calling people names.
OP added an adjective to describe a specific class of Reddit users. The body of the OP made it clear it doesn’t apply to all users and therefore isn’t a title.
Can you please quote where in the body or the title the OP placed instructions for calling people names?
your entire post is instructions for calling people names, you drama queen… with all the yearning and what not…
Could you please quote where the OP had these instructions?
Someone has been downvoting me every time I get a response from you on each comment.
That’s interesting. That’s not what I can see on my end, but then again Memmy has been pretty glitchy the last few days.
Are you seeing my point now?
Have you seen anyone downvoting you? Even when you’re acting like a stubborn fool, your karma for this conversation hasn’t been negatively impacted.
I feel like you are being a dick about this.
Funny, I could say the same about you.
I really don’t think you do, you are being incredibly closed minded and sticking your head in the sand. Because it has no* effect on you (yet).
That is a bold assumption to make. I’ve absolutely been affected by it on Reddit, and I’ve been banned from subreddits from saying the “wrong” things. Hell, I’m a lesbian who was banned from r/ActualLesbians because I said lesbians are attracted to women and not non-men.
I’m not sticking my head in the sand.
If you have controversial opinions just post them on controversial subs as well. A large part of “the right things” depends on the “right community”
That is entirely correct.
But not ‘being a dick’ is far too subjective in a global village… The world does not beat to one drum.
While I hear what you’re saying, it’s really not as complicated as you’re making it out to be.
I think that is too idealistic. It could very easily go into a downward spiral that a community could never get out of. It happens already on several subreddits already. You may not have experienced it, but I can say it for certain happens. There have even been scifi series written about it that have taken the concept to the extreme.
I’m familiar with some of the subreddits, but I believe you’re taking the spiral too steeply and too quickly.
The “don’t be a dick” philosophy will get you more than enough karma to comment on whatever subreddit you want to participate in, outside of some super niche ones.
I’m an engineering manager, started from the bottom now I’m here. Really, went junior dev / qa - dev - senior - staff then software architect then technical manager. Management is as hard as coding, but in a different way. Just because someone is not smashing their mechanical keyboards 8 hours per day doesn’t mean they’re lazy.
Thanks for your perspective. My career has followed a similar trajectory to yours, albeit in a completely different industry.
I’m getting tired of the short sighted version of antiwork which says only the worker drones have merit.
Let’s put it this way then. All of management could take a month off, and very little would be affected. If all the workers go on strike for a month, not a single thing would get done.
Again, I disagree. Plenty would not happen if all of management disappeared, just like plenty would not happen if all of workers disappeared.
Look, I get it. We all hate managers and the C suite. But pretending like these roles are aren’t vital is detrimental.
The guys on the bottom do all of the work, even if there are a few people slacking off.
No, the guys on the bottom do much of the work. The guys on the top also do quite a bit of mission critical work, but in an entirely different venue.
Some on the bottom will slack off, just like some on the top will slack off.
To the guys at the top, it’s always the bottom folks who are lazy. To the guys on the bottom, it’s always the top folks who are lazy.
requiring basic levels of karma most certainly is. You have to say the right things first to get the group approval before you can contribute.
Again, I disagree. You can say the “right things,” certainly, or you can say “neutral things.” Really anything short of overt hostility would be acceptable.
Sure. Good thing Biden ain’t running anymore!