• jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, to maximize ad spend, not to take down a government for another government’s benefit.

    • Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      You know though that the United States have “taken down” governments before? Americans do not have any right to feel superior on this issue in the slightest way

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Does it matter what the US did or didn’t do? The US government should always put Americans first.

        Should we not ban TikTok because ourfounding fathers had slaves too?

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        They literally sold the data for money. Not trying to topple a government.

        • exanime
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          So they sell data for money, to people who wanted to influence an election … But you see that as different?

          • jaschen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes. Tell me what is more effective. Having a software that you own that you can segment and target directly or buy data from a 3rd party and then try and use that platform which is not designed to influence elections and is also monitored by the NSA.