cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/9850201

Image Late January, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a notice of proposed rulemaking for establishing new requirements for Infrastructure as a Service providers (IaaS) . The proposal boils down to a ‘Know Your Customer’ regime for companies operating cloud services, with the goal of countering the activities of “foreign malicious actors.” Yet, despite an overseas focus, Americans won’t be able to avoid the proposal’s requirements, which covers CDNs, virtual private servers, proxies, and domain name resolution services, among others.

  • Monkey With A Shell
    link
    fedilink
    2719 days ago

    That’ll only ever pass of the big cloud vendors allow it. No way that Azure/AWS/Google wouldn’t object if a sizable portion of their user base get upset and threaten to leave. How much of that user base argues is unknown though.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      The money makers for large clouds are companies. They won’t care about this legislation

      • Monkey With A Shell
        link
        fedilink
        719 days ago

        Generally yes, it would matter a lot how it was structured. Today you couldn’t call up AWS and ask for the details on a service owner out of privacy reasons and there are ways to register things by proxy. If they started stripping those kind of protections away though there’s bound to be some pushback.

  • @DevCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1319 days ago

    Let’s see. Email - Iceland Web host - Iceland VPN - Sweden Backup - Norway

    Did I miss anything?

  • haui
    link
    fedilink
    1319 days ago

    Every time I read news like this I‘m glad I moved to my own cloud.

      • haui
        link
        fedilink
        819 days ago

        Check out my setup if you want.

        Costs depend on a lot of factors. If you are technically adept you might be able to get away with 20 bucks a month for the whole setup but most folks wouldn’t imo. I also have some old hardware I was able to use and upgraded it. Initial invest for a homeserver varies greatly depending on who you know.

        If you want to know more please ask. You can also hit me up on matrix. Link in bio.

        • @archer@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          216 days ago

          I did a similar setup for my own cloud on several Raspberry Pis (one master and two backup devices). The backups are placed offsite and sync the entire content of the master device. The next step I want to try now is running a Proxmox cluster (on x86) that now only syncs contents but also provides identical copies in a high availability setup (like a “real” cloud would).

          • haui
            link
            fedilink
            115 days ago

            Thats actually not a bad idea. Long term selfhosted cloud solutions will have to compete on availability/redundancy. You might want to help the NC folks to implement that on their docker setup or something?

  • The Doctor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    919 days ago

    Hot on the heels of piracy spiking when streaming media libraries were being pared down. This reads like a shot against seedboxes.

  • Archon of the Valley
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    It’s actually rather stunning to see just how hard they’re attacking privacy in these final months of the disastrous dumpster fire that is the Biden administration. This is exactly why I believe centralized cloud and CDN infrastructure is massively dangerous.

    Make the web decentralized again.

    • PirateJesusOP
      link
      English
      317 days ago

      I haven’t heard the alternative candidates talk about how they’ll fight for our privacy.

      • Archon of the Valley
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -316 days ago

        I didn’t mention the others. It’s simply that this current “administration” has been a disaster in literally every way so it’s not surprising they’re trying to end our constitutional rights.