• Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I actually don’t think they can name the company directly. If I remember right that’s unconstitutional.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Not American, but that doesn’t sound right… whose rights are being violated in that case? A multinational corporation?

      I can see why you shouldn’t name an actual person, though.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Our Corporations have the same rights we do with one exception. If my rights and my employer’s rights come into conflict, say on religious freedom, I’m forced to accept the corporation’s right to force me into religious practice. So they have first class and we have second class.

    • FiniteBanjo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I cannot imagine why that would be unconstitutional, please explain it to me.