It started with notebooks, but that wasn’t the master plan.

  • Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I hope not phones. Fairphone has the repairable market, and that would take away from Framework as well as Framework taking away from Fairphone, making both weaker.

    Maybe tablets would make sense, if you could reuse components from the laptops.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Fairphone has the repairable market

      In Europe.

      Framework sells their products in more markets, including North America, which adds another 600 million potential customers.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          That’s a third party who installs their own version of android on Fairphones and then sells them.

          I’m in Canada, and they don’t ship here. If I place an order as an American, all versions and variants are on backorder and there’s no mention of parts availability.

          So, no. They don’t officially sell or support the North American market.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        When you have a small market niche, competition can kill both companies. I’m not worried about options, I’m worried that soon both companies won’t exist.

    • ky56@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think the only way it makes sense for Framework to get into the phone market is to follow the footsteps of Pine64 trying to create Linux phones. There’s no point making a phone at an inherently higher cost to make it more durable and repairable with a “closed SDK” SoC that has a fixed EoL date. I made a more detailed comment about this in the main thread.