alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 1 year agoAMD rumored to use 'slow' 18Gbps GDDR6 in RDNA 4 — leaker says Team Red's next generation GPUs won't use GDDR7www.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square14linkfedilinkarrow-up154arrow-down13cross-posted to: hardware@lemmit.online
arrow-up151arrow-down1external-linkAMD rumored to use 'slow' 18Gbps GDDR6 in RDNA 4 — leaker says Team Red's next generation GPUs won't use GDDR7www.tomshardware.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 1 year agomessage-square14linkfedilinkcross-posted to: hardware@lemmit.online
minus-squareAtHeartEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 year agoTotally fine with me, I just want more vram, way more vram
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoWho needs texture compression or advanced streaming techniques when you can just have all 200GB of data in memory at once?
minus-squareAtHeartEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoFor gaming, the improvement in cores matters much more than the memory bandwidth, and for machine learning, more memory is needed desperately, so a new core with more vram, even if it’s not the latest hot shit vram, I would be totally happy with.
Totally fine with me, I just want more vram, way more vram
deleted by creator
128gb of gddr5! Lol
Who needs texture compression or advanced streaming techniques when you can just have all 200GB of data in memory at once?
For gaming, the improvement in cores matters much more than the memory bandwidth, and for machine learning, more memory is needed desperately, so a new core with more vram, even if it’s not the latest hot shit vram, I would be totally happy with.