• HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      no the risk of losing money. are you talking a system where money does not exist as a means of trade?

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          if a worker loses money they risk becoming a poorer worker. is the worked paid? do they have money? what level of money makes one a capitalist? in your world. I had someone else come along with similar concerns but they seemed to just be talking about corporations which I kinda get then but commerce happens on all levels.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Workers work for wages, Capitalists recieve profits off of ownership. This isn’t “my” world, this is the world.

            • HubertManne@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              so workers do not own anything they make profit off of? Like a car they use to do uber rides? in this world. that is what you think? you think that is reality?

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Uber drivers are gig workers, and firmly in the Proletariat. They ultimately use and depend on Uber’s infrastructure and Capital. Owning a car for personal use and also using it for your job you work for a wage for does not mean you profit off of ownership in the manner a Capitalist profits off the work of others.

                This is, in fact, reality.

                • HubertManne@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Ill accept it for the arguments sake. How about a homeowner that rents out a room and they only advertised with a sign in the window they bought themselves. They also have a job keep in mind. The rent from the room does not exactly pay all their needs it just offsets the mortgage. Are they workers?

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Petite bourgeoisie. Capitalists that do not drive enough income to survive without working. It’s a bit muddier than this, with respect to their personal job their power dynamic is clearly Proletarian, but they are attempting to escape that dynamic and become full bourgeois via landlording.