Apologies, I know it’s a shitty website.

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think they’d gladly accept those changes. I agree that men should be financially responsible from the point of conception but the language of calling it “child support” is definitely intentional and nefarious. They want zygotes to be looked at socially and legally as people to legitimize total abortion bans and the harsh punishments that follow.

    • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 years ago

      It also gives the father power over the mother. Just wait for: He pays for it, so he should have a say in whatever the mother does.

        • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I find incentivizing rape a bit out there. Rape is a crime of violence usually perpetrated with no thought to whether or not their would be a child. This is more nefarious. It continues to erode women’s self autonomy with the end goal to eventually reduce them to little more than breeding stock.

          • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 years ago

            If you scroll through incel forums or read the research papers regarding their communities this particular kind of rape and forced birth revenge is an outright fetish in those communities supported by a shameful amount of anime porn that services that particular fantasy.

            Rendering women to breeding stock is definitely the more widespread concern but I am not sure calling it further insentive for rape is actually all that off base.