The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Just Post@lemmy.world · 1 year agoIf you're old enough to remember, it's a little unsettling and strange.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square189linkfedilinkarrow-up1889arrow-down115
arrow-up1874arrow-down1imageIf you're old enough to remember, it's a little unsettling and strange.lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Just Post@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square189linkfedilink
minus-squareStalinwolf@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up42arrow-down4·1 year agoSaw this on Facebook and the comments were teaming with boomers and morons insisting it was because cars are now more aerodynamic.
minus-squareIrateAnteater@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up27·1 year agoThat will have a non-zero effect, but it’s far from the whole story.
minus-squareBuffaloaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoBecause cars in the 90’s weren’t aerodynamic? There’s been improvements, sure, but most cars then still had pretty good coefficients of drag. But sure, blame anything except climate change.
minus-squareBlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThis but unironically coupled with about half the total insects we had back then.
minus-squarethe_third@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-211 months agodeleted by creator
Saw this on Facebook and the comments were teaming with boomers and morons insisting it was because cars are now more aerodynamic.
That will have a non-zero effect, but it’s far from the whole story.
Because cars in the 90’s weren’t aerodynamic? There’s been improvements, sure, but most cars then still had pretty good coefficients of drag.
But sure, blame anything except climate change.
This but unironically coupled with about half the total insects we had back then.
deleted by creator