Then, responding to those who have said he’s “only doing this for the money", Szymanski tweeted: “Yes, no fucking shit. I make games for a living. If I didn’t want to earn money from them I wouldn’t charge money for them.”

The game follows the premise of being trapped in an underwater submarine out of necessity to capture deep pictures.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Did they face significant backlash? Or is IGN just trying to “make fetch happen”? I might have just missed it.

    • Snazz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe it. A friend of mine raised the price of his game from free to $2 with a big update, and still kept the download for the older version free. He got all sorts of backlash, even death threats. These people are children.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Tweets do not represent significant backlash .

        Edit Significant backlash would be something like getting delisted from steam

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          A ton of people attacking the dev on Twitter is significant backlash. An earthquake does not have to cause a Tsunami to have a big effect.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          7 months ago

          IMO, not even visiting is very weird. Just use a blocker and steal their revenue.

          As an uninformed, I also wonder why you think IGN would make up stuff.

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            They (including Musk) make money off of how ubiquitous it is, even if you’re not viewing ads. They leverage that daily view count.

            No judgement, but if you’re visiting X/Twitter, you’re supporting them. As for IGN, there’s the “too much water” controversy, but basically, they’re just way too corporate for me…

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Not using a service that you dont like and dont agree with is weird? Really?

            • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s like insisting on always paying with cash imo. Does some ethics but quite a bit of an inconvenience if you’re in a queue.

              • Kedly@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Ok yeah, you can be annoyed, but your cash example is ALSO perfectly fine if a person decides digital money isnt for them

          • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            7 months ago

            You can’t say things like that here! We are a bunch of nerds who cling so tightly to online privacy and morals it is practically our personality!

            Nah it is weird, in the sense that most people really won’t put in that much energy to avoid a site even if it was to gather information. It’s atypical.