• CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh, no. I mean, if that were true, that one outcome is decidedly worse than the other, how would it even be a contest? In any case, I don’t understand how any of this is strategic.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      how would it even be a contest

      Because there are swaths of selfish people out there.

      Sounds like you might be one of them.

      The strategy is pretty obviously to vote and advocate against the worse option.

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The strategy is pretty obviously to vote and advocate against the worse option.

        That is just voting and having an opinion, not really a strategy. What is the incumbent campaign’s strategy for reelection? Are they just hoping that enough voters will see it your way (I presume), in spite of supporting the genocide as well as the policies that more or less haven’t changed since the previous administration?

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          That is just voting and having an opinion

          Anyone whose “opinion” is that Trump would be fine, is to be shamed. Plain and simple.

          • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            So then the strategy is to shame anyone who isn’t fervently anti-Trump into changing their mind? How is that supposed to work given the Trump era policies that are still in place or the incumbent administration’s material and rhetorical support for the Israeli’s genocidal persecution of the Palestinians? If people want to avoid shame, then not voting for either of the contenders, or at all, seems like the best move for them.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You’ve got it twisted. You aren’t voting strategically. That has nothing to do with campaign strategy.

                  Keep up.

                  • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    What on Earth is “voting strategically” supposed to mean individual voters in US Presidential elections? Arriving at polling places early? Voting by mail? Or do you mean something illicit like voting early and often?