• Obi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cops and landlords are not all people, unless I’m misreading this thread, that was my point.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I don’t do any of this, I only jumped in to point out the grammatical miscomprehension between y’all, I’m as neutral as Switzerland here.

          • Obi@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ok I guess it’s hard to focus because you are agitated by this thread, totally understandable.

            You make a point about generalising “all people” (which was totally valid btw).

            Other commentators point out that cops and landlords aren’t “all people” (as in, there are people that exist that are neither cops or landlords), and they’re “only” generalising these sub-groups (again, not saying I agree with that either).

            Miscomprehension ensues.

              • Obi@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                No worries! I’m just proud we turned it around. The goalposts were indeed moved on a technicality here. There are certainly a ton of people around here that refuse any nuance on these two groups, I totally got your point and think it’s a fair one, I also don’t like blanket statements.