Class traitors are good. I can’t think of a successful revolution that wasn’t full of them.
Why would they be “too cowardly to admit” being a good thing? Why are we so hostile to the same good thing that’s featured prominently in every successful revolution? This is leaning towards ultraleftism.
Everything is ultra-leftism to you, either that, or “stuff that won’t build a mass-movement” when it’s against the crackers. I don’t think you have any ground to label what’s good and bad to revolution anymore. I for one, am not putting my faith in fairweather fence-sitters when the last time we saw one of any prominence was a hundred years ago.
Because they’re a working class person who will side with the bourgeoisie. They aren’t petit bourgeoisie, they use their own labour. Class traitors can go in either direction. Working class people can be convinced to work against their own best interests.
Class traitors are good. I can’t think of a successful revolution that wasn’t full of them.
Why would they be “too cowardly to admit” being a good thing? Why are we so hostile to the same good thing that’s featured prominently in every successful revolution? This is leaning towards ultraleftism.
🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Everything is ultra-leftism to you, either that, or “stuff that won’t build a mass-movement” when it’s against the crackers. I don’t think you have any ground to label what’s good and bad to revolution anymore. I for one, am not putting my faith in fairweather fence-sitters when the last time we saw one of any prominence was a hundred years ago.
24-hours after edit: 🦗🎵, 🦗🎵, 🦗🎵, 🦗🎵
7-days after edit: 🦗🎵, 🦗🎵, 🦗🎵, 🦗🎵
Because they’re a working class person who will side with the bourgeoisie. They aren’t petit bourgeoisie, they use their own labour. Class traitors can go in either direction. Working class people can be convinced to work against their own best interests.