• Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you want your Messiah to be from Bethlehem, then why not just make him be from Bethlehem?

    Narrative appeal. Compare the alternatives:

    1. Jesus was born in Bethlehem.
    2. Jesus’ family was from Bethlehem. However Joseph and Mary had to flee to Nazareth, as Herod ordered the massacre of children, thus Jesus was born in Nazareth.

    The second one is simply more appealing. People like “meaty” stories, full of details and twists.

    For comparison: #1 is like having Superman being simply an Earthling mutant, instead of as the prince of an alien planet. The former is boring, thus less likely to catch the attention of the people.

    Then there’s the problem that he died in a manner reserved for the dregs of society. What kind of god does that?

    Look at Greek tragedy.

    Achilles dragging Hector’s body behind a chariot, something so dishonourable that the gods had to intervene - because a half-god was desecrating the corpse of a prince.

    Or Heracles killing his own mortal half in a pyre to avoid the excruciating pain, while his immortal half ascends to godhood. It’s a half-god committing suicide, after being tricked by his own wife.

    And yet neither Hector nor Heracles are historical.

    Is Jesus being crucified so odd, in the light of those? It’s tragedy - it delivers emotional impact, and plays really well with the theme of the story: “He might be the son of a god, but he’s still treated as so disgusting that his corpse is not allowed to touch Mother Earth, to not dirty Her. That is not a problem - because the flesh is not the soul, his soul is divine. As him you should endure suffering of the flesh, as your own soul is also being prepared for The Kingdom of God.”