“State transportation agencies are the recipients of the money,” he said. “Nearly all of them had no experience deploying electric vehicle charging stations before this law was enacted.”

  • hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    You’re going to trust the exact same industry that grifted away 10 years and billions of dollars on hydrogen fuel cells only to switch to the promise of EVs when the grift ran out? Good luck with that.

    How much power would be needed to switch to EVs everywhere? Where does that power come from? Recognizing that manufacturing and transportation are also extremely carbon intensive, would we actually be better off switching or is this just another opportunity to dump money in to the auto industry?

    The US had massive rail infrastructure in the past. We know that’s possible. I don’t have any evidence that electric vehicles would actually improve things even if they can be rolled out. Why would I believe an industry that has lied before and has every incentive to lie again? Why would anyone?

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s less than $10B across 50 states for charging infrastructure, not to auto manufacturers as I understand, despite what you’re saying. And yeah I have 2 electric cars in my garage and live next to two of the largest wind farms in the country.

      Redoing rail the right way, doing full scale infrastructure overhauling to enable bicycles and revised public transit, or whatever else that services all 50 states are all projects with two more zeros and probably decades of work to build. Sorry you’re jaded about that, but thousands of charging stations would be, I suspect, better in the long run than handing out bird scooters that you can only use year round in less than half of CONUS.

      I will take the increment. If you don’t want to buy an electric car, don’t. Burn some gas and go vegan I guess.