FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 9 个月前Please, for the love of God, VOTE!pawb.socialimagemessage-square712fedilinkarrow-up11.04Karrow-down1159cross-posted to: 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up1882arrow-down1imagePlease, for the love of God, VOTE!pawb.socialFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 9 个月前message-square712fedilinkcross-posted to: 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squareJaysyn@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·9 个月前LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not. You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments.
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-29 个月前You know what this sort of rhetorical technique they’re using reminds me of? Sovereign citizens lmao.
minus-squarehoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·9 个月前 LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not. duverger’s “law” has no predictive value at all. it’s post-hoc storytelling. you can’t prove it wrong because it’s a useless tautology.
minus-squarehoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·9 个月前 You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments. baby, i’m an anarchist.
minus-squarehoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·9 个月前nonfalsifiability is actually a bad feature in theories.
LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not.
You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments.
You know what this sort of rhetorical technique they’re using reminds me of? Sovereign citizens lmao.
duverger’s “law” has no predictive value at all. it’s post-hoc storytelling. you can’t prove it wrong because it’s a useless tautology.
baby, i’m an anarchist.
nonfalsifiability is actually a bad feature in theories.