• GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Afaik they’re waiting for version xx.1 with bug fixes. Idk if GNOME is unstable in xx.0 and idk why it has such a special place on Arch but what I do know is that Plasma 6 is quite bad now with its 6.0.2 so I guess this delay is a good idea because I’m a GNOME user and I want stable experience

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      The added benefit in the delay on Arch is that most maintained extensions will have already been made compatible by the time it hits the repos.

    • 1984
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Don’t think it’s bad? It seems to have been a great release with Plasma 6. Don’t have any issues myself and haven’t seen anything major. But maybe I missed it.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Idk about your hardware but on mine it’s not good. There were even full desktop crashes (the ones that make systemd boot log appear and only switching to a different session can make the system usable again). Btw I noticed issues on both Xorg and Wayland smh. Can’t remember them now though

        • 1984
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah it can vary of course. It works good on my machine. Amd graphics.