Social media seems to be laughing its ass off about this tragedy, is it because the folks at burning man are perceived as frivolous hippies or something? Everyone I’ve ever met who was a regular burning man attendee has been a solid human being with strong morals, personally and financially responsible, a career. Upstanding members of society for sure. I guess all some people know is the sensationalized drugs and sex. A person died. This is a tragedy for an event that brings positivity into the world. Kind of annoyed.

  • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    aside from the obvious “rich people exploiting the environment with their hippy party that costs $200 for their cheapest tickets,” I saw a video online that brought up a good point that I never considered. The cost of lumber has increased exponentially in the past 3 years alone, jumping to nearly $1700 per 1000 feet at its peak in 2021, but staying between $400 and $600 per 1000 feet in recent months (still high compared to say 10 years ago.) And these people are buying tens of thousands of feet of lumber solely to burn it away in the middle of nowhere where there’s little vegetation to absorb the excess CO2 waste. That, along with the climate change protesters being police brutalized just before the event, really puts a sour taste in people’s mouths. Especially in a time where “once in a lifetime” weather events seem to be back-to-back.

    economic data from: https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/lumber

    • xatlw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tickets cost about 10x that. I was interested back when it was a cool art exchange, freedom event. But SO many people flock to it as a giant party that it’s become restrictive unless your volunteering or bringing an exhibit.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        From old burners I have talked to, the entire experience has completely changed. Alcohol used to be frowned upon, now it’s common place.

    • kitos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sincerely with rocket launches now being a daily thing i’m not very worried by that burning lumber.

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And these people are buying tens of thousands of feet of lumber solely to burn it away in the middle of nowhere where there’s little vegetation to absorb the excess CO2 waste.

      That’s not really how plants work.

      Photosynthesis turns co2 + water into sugar + oxygen. Cellular respiration turns sugar + oxygen into co2 + water.

      The total co2 absorbed by a plant is exactly equal to the amount of co2 used to make all the sugar, cellulose, etc. the plant currently has. Digestion, decomposition, fires etc. undo that.

      A mature forest or lawn is carbon neutral: new growth is balanced out by decomposition of old growth.

      Distance to plants doesn’t matter. What matters is if and how the trees they’re burning are being replanted or replaced. .

    • heird@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yesterday in the US it was labour day, 100 of millions of Americans has a BBQ many using coal and wood the impact of burning man is insignificant in comparison

      • Scribbd@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What are fossil fuels other than captured carbon from plants and animals from long ago?

        Rereleasing carbon is the problem now. Wood being sustainable needs a non-surplus in carbon emissions to begin with.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everything is “carbon neutral” on a long enough timescale. One of many reasons why that expression is 100% unadulterated bollocks. If you’re an airline, you can’t just offset the damage you do by paying a Bangladeshi farmer two dollars to throw some tree seeds on the ground.

          • Scribbd@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Burning man should become Burried man. Everybody should dig a hole and burry the wood. That is carbon capture.

            I am not an expert. So this could just be a naive take. I wouldn’t be surprised burying wood actually amplifies the carbon emissions due to some reactions with soil, or something.

            • Blackmist@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I would think the biggest pollutant there would be all the fuel.

              Getting there and back (and the location could be charitably described as the arse end of nowhere), all the rented RVs with the air con running… Burning a wooden effigy wouldn’t even come close.

            • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, decomposition releases methane over time, slower than burning does, but buried wood in the desert is more likely to petrify than rot. There’s a lot to be said for burying wood in certain situations. Hugelkultur (making agricultural/garden mounds out of wood and soil) if done right can do amazing things (everything from creating microclimates that increase biodiversity to supercharging the soil with beneficial fungi/bacteria, to increasing water retention).