Feel like you want to sneer about something but you donā€™t quite have a snappy post in you? Go forth and be mid!

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post, thereā€™s no quota here and the bar really isnā€™t that high

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

    • swlabr@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      A friend that wants you to have an aggressive brain tumour to make an AI look good is no friend at all

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        8 months ago

        There are far too many people in this world who learned both wrong things from the ā€œPray tell, Mr Babbageā€ anecdote

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      ā€œOh, some patient data. Let me quickly casually scan this into the sv datacorp. Whatā€™s thatā€¦privacy concerns? Naaaaah I changed the filenameā€

    • Jayjader@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      ā€œBut look how convincing [it] sounds!ā€

      ā€¦ how did we get to the point where the ai bros are un-ironically telling us, as a selling point, that their shiny toy literally gives false yet convincing-sounding medical diagnoses ?!?!?!

      If I were working on Claude and wanted to hype it up, I would not talk about this experiment online or in public. If I were working on Claude and wanted to be responsible towards ā€œthe publicā€, I would use this example as a cautionary warning, not to further hype up the tool.

      This feels like the slight period at the beginning of the NFT craze when I wasnā€™t yet comfortable dismissing out of hand anyone excited about them, because surely there was a least some useful application that wasnā€™t for scamming people, and surely this many people couldnā€™t all be so deluded about the same idea.