Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said policy differences toward Israel between her and President Biden won’t stop her from supporting him in the November general election.

“Of course,” Omar said Tuesday, when asked by CNN’s Abby Phillip on “NewsNight” whether she would vote for Biden if the election were held that day, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. “Democracy is on the line, we are facing down fascism.”

“And I personally know what my life felt like having Trump as the president of this country, and I know what it felt like for my constituents, and for people around this country and around the world,” Omar continued. “We have to do everything that we can to make sure that does not happen to our country again.”

  • juicy
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    We have states with 20% of voters choosing uncommitted. What are you on about?

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      80% > 20%

      And that’s of Democrats who voted in the primary.

      There’s just way more supporters of Israel than there are people who dislike genocide. Biden has to be careful to not lose their votes.

      • juicy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can’t assume the 80% of people who voted for Biden would abandon him the minute he withdrew his support of genocide. They might as easily believe the fud I keep hearing here that an uncommitted vote is tantamount to a vote for Trump.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Likewise, not all of the 20% would withold their votes if he continues to support Israel.

          But regardless of the actual number, it’s pretty clear that “votes at risk if I continue to support Israel” is a much smaller number than “votes at risk if I denounce Israel”. The resulting political calculus is unavoidable. Biden can work for a ceasefire, but acting or speaking in direct opposition to Israel is a terrible idea.

          • juicy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s not clear at all that a smaller number of votes are at risk. And the whole idea that whether Biden supports genocide should the result of a political calculus is abhorrent.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s life, if you can’t handle it go get therapy or something. “Stop all bad things” is not always an option, you have to pick the least bad sometimes.

              • juicy
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                No matter how many mental gymnastics you do, you are still voting for genocide if you vote for Joe Biden.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You’re voting for genocide no matter what. You’re just voting to genocide harder if you do anything other than vote for Biden.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    voting for Jill Stein or Cornel West or de la Cruz are votes against genocide

      • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I was under the impression that refusing to do the right thing because you’re scared of the consequences was the definition of cowardice.

                • juicy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yes, the ad hominem attack has been famous for its effectiveness since Ancient Greece. The key is to start by engaging with a comment you disagree with using logic. But when you run out of reasoned responses and they think they’ve cornered you, call them a name or insult their mother. 99% of the time it works every time.

          • juicy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yes, the ad hominem attack has been famous for its effectiveness since Ancient Greece. The key is to start by engaging with a comment you disagree with using logic. But when you run out of reasoned responses and they think they’ve cornered you, call them a name or insult their mother. 99% of the time it works every time.