• CPMSP@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    10 months ago

    Obviously knows neither the spirit nor the letter of established law…Texas huh? Yeah, that tracks.

    • Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      We have a law in Texas that an Atheist can’t hold office. Really stupid, but it would have to be challenged to get rid of it.

      edit: went and looked it up

      Article 1, Section 4 of the Texas Constitution states, “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall anyone be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being.”

      • HopingForBetter@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ll gladly acknowledge the existence of a supreme being; my tuxedo cat is very supreme.

        …we don’t have to say which being is supreme, right?

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        By that verbage, claiming to be pastafarian meets those requirments.

        Would pay good money to see a official painting of someone with a collander on their head.

      • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        We have a law in Texas that an Atheist can’t hold office. Really stupid, but it would have to be challenged to get rid of it.

        Just to be clear that’s unconstitutional. That law has no force or effect.

        Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 (1961)

        • Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yes, it’s unconstitutional…buuut, the shitty way our political system works, somebody would have to sue to get it removed in Texas. Until someone does, they’re going to enforce it.

          edit: in Texas

          • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The text is never going to be removed for sure because that takes action. But also no one is enforcing it either. I’d love to hear about anyone it’s been enforced against, if they exist.

            • Valon_Blue@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              If you think they’re not going to fight tooth and nail to enforce it in Texas, you don’t know Texas. It would probably have to go to SCOTUS.

              • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I just asked who has been barred from the ballot as a result. I’m aware of Republican candidates raising the issue in TX, only to be informed that it’s unconstitutional. To my knowledge, no one has ever been barred since that case. If you have different information please let me know.

                If someone were barred, they would sue in federal district court and immediately receive an injunction. Federal courts cannot ignore precedent from SCOTUS.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      10 months ago

      Every single interview with Republicans (and Democrats) should include the host correcting their stupid lies.

      I added and Democrats, but we all know the ratio of who is going to be called out for blatant lies.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I was hoping this was the bi bull video. :p I love it.

      “Ohhh noooo, I swore on an a bi bull, I done it three times Jay.”

      Dude has like 4 brain cells and they’re all busting their ass to hold his face in a way that doesn’t make him look stupid and they’re doing a terrible job of it.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ever since this video, I’ve been pronouncing the word bible the way this guy does, around the house.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    “The first biblical command for all rulers and all persons in authority is to worship God,” Schaefer said. “It’s all over the Bible."

    Oh, the Bible says one must worship the god of the Bible? Shocking!

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I act the way I act because the Good Book tells me so

      If I wanna known how to be good, it’s to the Good Book that I go

      'Cos the Good Book is a book and it is good and it’s a book

      There’s no reason why we should take a look

      At any other book

      But the Good Book

      'Cause it’s good

      And it’s a book

      And it’s a book

      And it’s quite good!

      Good is good and evil’s bad

      And kids get killed when God gets mad

      And you’d better take a good look

      At the Good Book

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You know, if they actually followed the moral teachings laid out in the Bible - the spirit, not the letter - I’d almost be okay with this. The problem is that the vast majority of these self-proclaimed Christians don’t. Not even remotely close.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are very much Christians and their book is fucked, even if you try to find a moral in it. What’s the moral of a guy being fucked with by his god and being told to murder his own child? Or the moral of a man offering his daughters to a bunch of rapists, or the moral of a bunch of kids getting killed by a bear cause they made fun of a guy being bald? It’s a weird ass book through and through

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      I just assumed the God they were always talking about was money. You’re telling me it’s something else?

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      You know, if they actually followed the moral teachings laid out in the Bible - the spirit, not the letter - I’d almost be okay with this.

      Have you read the Bible? It’s pretty horrific all the way through. Any good is pretty well overshadowed. The spirit and the letter are awful.

      Turn the other cheek, but also buy your slaves from the heathen that surround you and feel free to beat them with a rod as long as they don’t die immediately.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      the spirit, not the letter

      Idk, man. I could totally go for some of that liturgically mandated Jesus Style Socialism right about now.

  • Teon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    “to worship god”???
    Is it Priapus? Is it?
    Please tell me it is, because that is a very BIG deal.
    I’m in!!!

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Founders were VERY clear on both being allowed to Shoot Up Schools AND on everyone being REQUIRED to Worship God! I LOVE the Constitution!

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This guy snorts bath salts, guaranteed.

    Texas and Florida in a race to the bottom

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Okay, but Matt Schaefer needs to clearly state which god he’s worshiping first. And if its the wrong god, we get to burn him as a heretic.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Welp… you’re allowed to have your opinion, Matty Boy, you’re allowed to express that opinion. But enacting that opinion would be in explicit contravention of the US Constitution. Given that you’re from Texas, Matt, I can understand being guided more by feelings and not wanting to read, but it’s just the First Amendment, you won’t even have to go very far. I believe in you buddy, give it a read, then go shut the fuck up.

    /vent

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I wonder which church he goes to and if they ever endorse a specific person or party that would be grounds to revoke their tax exempt status? Might be worth attending a few local churches this year as an ‘out of towner’ to record the homily on your phone, you know just to listen to later.