East Asia countries birth rate crisis continues. In response to total fertility rate of 0.55, Korea enhances infertility aid.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It baffles me that the SK government is evidently incapable of understanding that the issue is wage slavery. Everyone needs to work themselves to the bone, and every single time there’s an efficiency improvement, wages don’t go up and hours worked don’t decline, but “the economy” gets “stronger”. Which most workers don’t actually see any benefit from. So don’t be surprised that your citizens simply don’t have the energy or free time to even consider starting a family.

    You can, of course, replace “SK” with many other countries, and the paragraph still works 100%.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Capitalism works more efficiently than politics. Politics needs a big overhaul to deal with this.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        A better strategy would be to pull back from late-stage capitalism and find some sort of equitable happy medium between that and socialism that doesn’t also destroy our ecosystem, while maintaining a (small-d) democratic form of government.

        • Wanderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          As much as this website loves socialism I don’t ever see that being the right idea.

          Sure education, healthcare and infrastructure should be owned in by the government which exist in most capitalist countries.

          But long term its going to legally minimise working hours and UBI

  • _xDEADBEEF@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    seems like they’re willing to try anything but fix their dogshit work culture

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Leaders don’t really care about the culture. The current economic and financial system need growth and most growth comes from increasing population. That’s their real concern.

    • ViXY_DBC@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No question the world is struggling with 9 billion people, and developed world is using excessive amount of resources.

      The rigid definition of “countries” may stand in the way of a more collaborative world though.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Careful. The last time I suggested that we needed fewer people in the world, I was accused of being a Eugenicist.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tankies consider any form of population control to be a form of eco fascism. Evangelicals feel pretty much the same.

      • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, because it’s not true.

        We have more than enough resources to feed everyone on earth. We have the land, we have the money to pay the farmers, we have the infrastructure to transport it anywhere in the world easily and quickly. The issue we’re having isn’t too many people, but a small group of people utilizing multiples of the energy they need, and dozens of multiples of the energy of the masses of the world.