• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is there a reason to care one way or the other about this? Because I haven’t been able to come up with one.

    • Jim_Just_Jim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah there are lots of reasons. Tiktok has been proven to be harvesting browsing habits, biometrics (facial ID and fingerprints), voice identification, key logging, and more.

      You are giving your face, fingerprints, and voice to a state sponsored entity in the age of deep fakes and broad sweeping intelligence operations.

      If you’re pro China, then this is a good thing. If you care about identity theft, deep fakes, or your credentials being sold on the dark web, then tiktok is a Very Bad Thing.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Seems like the big difference between that and Facebook is China. I’m not sure that’s a big reason to be concerned specifically about TikTok.

        • Jim_Just_Jim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          A US company is held accountable to US law and more importantly, by the US citizens.

          If you hand your data to Facebook and they abuse it, there are at least some ways to hold Facebook accountable publicly and financially.

          If you hand your data to Chinese sponsored corporations, there is even less accountability.

          Make no mistake, all corporations are collecting and exploiting your information, but if you are a US citizen, you should seriously consider not giving persona and biometric data to a foreign power that can’t be held accountable.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you hand your data to Facebook and they abuse it, there are at least some ways to hold Facebook accountable publicly and financially.

            You can’t possibly believe that. When has Facebook ever been held accountable?

            • Jim_Just_Jim@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Google is your friend.

              Firstly, the US government has greater authority and ability to fine or otherwise leverage financial action against companies incorporated in the US.

              Secondly, Facebook leadership has been repeatedly called to testify in front of Congress for various reasons in recent years, and in doing so has been held accountable for numerous failures. In August of last year they paid out $725 mil in a class action lawsuit. Although not US, still NATO example: In May of 2023 they were fined 1.2b euros for breach of data by the UK.

              They were also recently called to testify in front of US congress about the online child exploitation crisis.

              Granted they make billions, but they are getting punished for mismanagement, both publicly and financially. It may be a drop in the bucket, so to speak, but it’s been enough for them to change their policies and practices over the years.

              Action against tiktok is intended to do the same.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                9 months ago

                Firstly, the US government has greater authority and ability to fine or otherwise leverage financial action against companies incorporated in the US.

                But never does it with Facebook and not over gathering data, your reasoning for banning TikTok.

                Secondly, Facebook leadership has been repeatedly called to testify in Congress for various reasons in recent years

                A slap on the wrist resulting in no significant changes and nothing to do with gathering data.

                In August of last year they paid out $725 mil in a class action lawsuit.

                Not the U.S. government. You could have the same lawsuit against TikTok.

                Although not US, still NATO example

                Irrelevant, other NATO countries are not currently trying to ban TikTok.

                They were also recently called to testify in front of US congress about the online child exploitation crisis.

                As above, a slap on the wrist resulting in no significant changes. Also, nothing to do with exploitation of data.

                they are getting punished for mismanagement, both publicly and financially.

                Slaps on the wrist are not punishment and they are not being punished for gathering data. They also make more revenue every single year. They haven’t lost any money.

                It may be a drop in the bucket, so to speak, but it’s been enough for them to change their policies and practices over the years.

                They have not changed any of their data gathering policies except to make them so that they can gather more data.

                Stop changing the subject. You said TikTok is getting banned by the government for data gathering. I told you Facebook is not being punished by the government for doing the same thing. All you can do is sue them. Just like you could sue TikTok if you could get a case together.

                You have not showed me to be incorrect.

                • Jim_Just_Jim@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  At this point I am choosing to no longer engage in this conversation. Your counter arguments seem to convey so little comprehension (willful or unwitting) that I feel engaging further would not meaningfully contribute to the discussions held in this thread moving forward.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I’m not surprised since you demonstrated very clearly that Facebook has not been punished by the U.S. government for data gathering despite TikTok getting punished for doing the same thing.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                Sorry… your evidence that Facebook would be held accountable in America, unlike TikTok, is a fine they were levied in Europe?

                • Tja@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  “when has Facebook ever been held accountable?”

                  There you go. I’m not going to chase goalposts.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Context is key. We’re talking about the U.S. government. I think it was clear to most people that I was talking about being accountable to the U.S. government.

                    Do I really have to type out everything in very great detail for you to understand what I’m talking about?

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s just classic moral panic. Our politicians really want us to hate China when it’s like, nah bruh I hate Microsoft.

      • Jim_Just_Jim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wouldn’t call this “classic moral panic”. I would characterize it as our nations leaders demanding that Tiktok revisit their data collection practices in the interest of protecting US citizens.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          If politicians cared about privacy they would be passing a law that inhibits Meta AND Tiktok. American industries get away with simmiliar level of BS, but privacy isn’t a concern to American politicians so long as it’s American eyes watching.

          • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            If politicians care one iota about privacy they’d be limiting and regulating what the government itself, some thing they have total control over, can aquire as data.

        • charles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          If politicians actually have a shit about protecting US citizens data, they’d push for legislation to protect US citizens data from all data harvesting apps. Instead “china bad, ban”.

    • pohart@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes. It’s not great that they’re banning a mass communication app. Tiktok is very often used for political communication and while I might support limiting the power of corporations in our political communication I don’t support the consolidation into even fewer hands.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, they’re not banning the app but foreign ownership. I wish they were targeting the data scraping practices, but then that’d hit US companies, too…

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          See I honestly think it’s because they’re so old that they genuinely don’t understand that issue

          They’re going after TikTok because foreign ownership of a National Security related industry gives them Red Scare flashbacks

          Most of the leadership are people who went through the Cuba-Turkey missile crisis, and it fucking shows, you could show these people a hello world program and they’d think it was hacking.

          Don’t run yourself ragged worrying about malicious intent when plain old incompetence suffices Occam’s Razor

          • honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            The average politicians may not present themselves as being smart, but the lobbyists, think tanks, advisors that interact with them and influence their behaviour are not dumb. Rather than assuming it’s either malice or ignorance, we can instead opt for a more middle ground assumption: it’s both malice and ignorance, symbiotically feeding off each other.

          • Null User Object@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, no, no! Ted Stephens got them all up to speed with his famous “Dump Trucks and Tubes” educational lecture. Now they’re all experts.