• winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    “It isn’t lifestyle”

    “Also three kids”

    You do realize having 3 kids was a choice right? Some of us choose no kids and can’t afford shit still

    • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s still a bad argument. You should be able to have kids and not starve. The fact that people choose no kids and still starve shows how fucked things are. We are all fighting the same fight, though our positions may be different.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      A society in which the poor can’t afford 3 kids and retirement savings is a failed society. I’m not one of those birth rates people but you absolutely should be able to afford to have the replacement rate number of children