About 59% of Americans say TikTok a threat to the national security of the United States, according to a new survey of U.S. adults.

  • galloog1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People said the same thing about Russia. Politics play a massive part.

    I’m not sure I can respect the argument if someone who’s play with a world war as long as they can access a single social media site. You obviously are expecting to not be the one fighting it.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Russia is similarly not a threat to the US. I agree with the people who said that.

      I won’t be fighting said war, but my son almost certainly would. I feel confident that it won’t happen and more than he’ll get eaten by a bear next time we go camping.

      Some fears aren’t worth entertaining.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        One of the things that best prevents a conflict is deterrence. That is what this is. By not deterring, you make conflict more likely. It is absolutely worth entertaining and we do all the time. That is why you have such confidence that it won’t happen. They are not a threat because we actively deter them from becoming one.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Banning TikTok is not a deterrent. Having a big navy is a deterrent.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Information dominance is our single greatest advantage in the West and has been since WWII. Code breakers did more to win in Europe than any bombing campaign alone and the Battle of Midway would not have been won otherwise. It is why Ukraine is doing so well to this day. Numbers only go so far.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              TikTok does not grant information dominance unless our government is dumb enough to pull a Russia and allow deployed soldiers in combat zones to post on TikTok, which I sincerely doubt.

              • galloog1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Always on location enables machine learning models to be developed on movement. This applies to troop movements, critical civilian infrastructure, and maximizing civil disruption. Always on audio enables the fully automated development of models that sound just like you enabling fake orders to be developed, propaganda, and misinformation at an individual user level. Always on video enables the mapping of military bases and threat profiling. Access to biometric data enables readiness assessments. Combinations of all of the above enable the development of combined information warfare which has not been possible yet.

                All of this has literally already been done, just not at scale yet but they are actively working on it. This is real and why we are working to deter it. It is no longer about individual networks anymore.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If it applies to troop movements, our military failed at basic infosec. If it applies to civilian movements outside of wartime, it’s useless information, since the US is very easy to map logistically.

                  All of this has been done, you’re right - in like 1812.

                  • galloog1@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The only thing I can do at this point is to encourage you to trust that warfare has indeed changed in the last 200 years and that we (somewhat) know what we are doing at a strategic level.