• Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      před 10 měsíci

      “Radical” just means “outside the status quo”. “Extremist” is more the term you want there.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          před 10 měsíci

          That is a better way of putting it, thanks. Not just outside the status quo but pushing to change it. I still think it carries a milder connotation than neo-Nazis or Anarchists and different language should be used for the fringe than just further-than-mainstream politics.

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            před 10 měsíci

            I don’t know many honest people for whom the current system is working great, so I’d warrant that not being some kind of radical might be the more extreme position

            • Soggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              před 10 měsíci

              You wouldn’t be the first to float some form of “centrism is an extreme position” and I can’t say I disagree.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        před 10 měsíci

        if we’re talking extremists we’re talking our boy the unambomber, and uh, the people that bombed abortion clinics, maybe.

        I dont actually have a good second handle for extremists on the right lol. I guess hate criming nazis? That kind of shit.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            před 10 měsíci

            i was thinking explicit actions, more so than vague terms, kind of defeats the whole point of describing “radical right/left wing” if we simply go back to using another vague term doesnt it?