I feel like this should be submitted to someone for a mental health review, this person should not own guns
If only there was some sort of screening for that, hmm.
No we can’t do that because hypothetically someone with a revolver is going to stop an entire dictatorship one day.
Mental health issue is a distraction by the right wing so no one looks too hard at the misanthropic mind washing they’ve been doing.
These people shoot people because they’re hateful shits.
I promise not to use the doorbell, instead I shall announce my arrival by throwing acorns at the door.
Topical 🌰
This is America, sonny! You don’t throw acorns like some forest folk! You unload your Glock 19 into the door frame and pray to God you don’t need more ammo!
“Praise the lord and pass the ammunition” ;)
You acorn owners are all the same. Don’t you know that acorn owners are twice as likely to have an acorn hit the roof of their car than non-acorn owners?
Just make sure there are no cops.
They might send a tank to take care of the acorn threat.
Why does this guy even have a doorbell?
How else would he know the burglars are coming?
The stupid part is he used the doorbell exactly as intended. That’s how he knew there was a kid at the door. He’s just trying to shift blame to innocent people doing innocuous things because he wants to shoot them.
Gotta have a reason to blast a kid these days sadly.
Because if they stand in front of the door knocker, the knocker might deflect the bullets.
At my house we mock the dogs for freaking out over the doorbell. “Yeah, a malicious person is going to bother ringing the doorbell”
This guy is on the level of our dogs.
Except dogs actually have a sense of loyality and can be loving. This person is just a fucking cockroach
Oh, I don’t think you can call his loyalty into question. I’m sure this man is very loyal.
To the right people, like a dog. The kid was probably black, which means he’s the wrong people.
“Yeah, a malicious person is going to bother ringing the doorbell”
I mean, yea that is a tactic home invaders use. It’s a good way to get someone to unlock their door. Is it a reason to shoot somebody for ringing your doorbell? Absolutely not, but being cautious about who you answer for doesn’t hurt.
Sure, it happens, but most of the time it’ doesnt. Most people will never have that happen in their lives.
An appropriate response to that fear might be using an intercom or chain lock or video doorbell to find out, or get a dog, or choose not to answer the door
I just don’t answer the door.
Not because I’m afraid of boogeymen, or anything, but because I just can’t be arsed. No one I want to talk to would try knocking or ringing my doorbell. It’s inevitably some tiresome asshole selling something, or pestering me about their whackadoo specialty religion, or begging for something, or it’s the cops with the wrong address.
You’re 100% correct. I was just replying to the “Yeah, a malicious person is going to bother ringing a doorbell” part of their comment that implied it never happens.
Yeah, I suppose it was an oversimplification, I won’t open the door withtout some sort of seeing who it is first. However the dogs reaction is always assume that the person ringing the bell is a dire threat, and thus far it never has been.
If you need a gun in order to feel safe in your own home, you live in a shithole country.
This is a safe country. Only the assclowns feeding off manufactured fears so they can own an arsenal think otherwise.
Unless you’re a minority and there’s a cop nearby.
Welcome to Russia. Here good Uncle Voenkom will give you gun bo matter you want it or not, but you will be in someone else’s home.
Or have a shithole mindset.
Or you have a severe case of paranoia.
The entire world is a shit hole at this point
Not quite yet, but we’re working on it.
Always has been 🌍👨🚀🔫👨🚀
Way too many people, especially Americans, have a gun-slinger complex. They’re looking for an excuse, any excuse, to use their guns, and feel like they’re “heroes”. These people are dangerous and the antithesis of what gun owners should be - responsible and careful. This ain’t the “well regulated militia” mentioned in the constitution, this is angsty, angry, insecure people with issues trying to act tough by shooting someone.
It’s a murder fetish. Flat out. They can hem and haw all they want, the end goal of owning a gun is murder.
“what if someone robs you?!”
So what, take my wallet with no cash and a card that’ll get locked. Take my phone and watch that are locked and my phone is set to factory reset after a few wrong codes. I can replace them.
“What if someone breaks into your house?!”
It’s just stuff. 🤷 They don’t want my fireproof document safe they want my consoles and pcs. My pcs are all backed up off site and the drives are encrypted.
In both cases I have serial numbers etc of everything also saved off site to report them stolen.
I put life over stuff. If you gotta pull a gun on me and demand my wallet you’re CLEARLY having a worse day than I am. If I do have cash whatever take my $50 idgaf 🤷
That’s kinda my thoughts on the matter. I have a couple rifles and shot guns that are mostly just family heirlooms, and one rifle that’s explicitly for protection.
Unfortunately i live in one of the most dangerous states in the south, and I’m a minority married to a white woman. When all the racist people in the state were getting all crazy during the trump years, I decided having a rifle that wasn’t an antique was probably a good idea.
But it’s pretty much explicitly for protecting my family and friends from the potential of eventual racial violence. I would actually feel kinda bad for anyone who actually tried to rob my house, there’s just nothing to really steal. Definitely nothing worth dying or killing for. Hell I’d probably make a pretty good return on the insurance claim.
the end goal of owning a gun is murder.
Well, I mean, depending on how you define murder. The end goal of a gun might also be hunting (which might be murder depending on your definition of like, whitetail deer being something worth preserving), sport shooting, or vintage collecting/odd engineering collecting. The main alternative use case mostly being hunting, I would say, nine times out of ten, which is still shadowed overwhelmingly be people who are super fear-mongered about randomly getting shot. You can definitely still kill someone with, say, a hunting rifle, a .22lr sport pistol with a barrel weight and a custom grip and a 1000 dollar reflex sight, or a vintage civil war musket, right, but I wouldn’t say that any of those things are really like, carried or owned with the end goal of killing someone.
I’d also bring up, as an intellectual point, more than anything else, since this really doesn’t tend to be a successful tactic in modern society, that someone can take all your stuff, right, but it might also be a very valuable tactic to just straight up kidnap you. There’s human trafficking, but then there’s also, them trying to extort your immediate family. You would see this more with nobles in the middle ages, though, I don’t think such a thing is really common enough nowadays to be worried about, basically at all, for the same reasons that it’s kind of absurd to expect someone to randomly break in to your house and steal all your shit while you’re still there. Most people looking to rob someone would much rather do so while nobody’s home, for pretty obvious reasons. If you were to kidnap someone, you’d probably want to go for the highest ROI possible and just go for like, a super rich trust fund kid, or something, which isn’t gonna be the vast majority of people. I think this tends to be the case more often in other countries.
The fucked up part to me is that we have convinced basically the majority of gun owners, who might otherwise be normal, non-gun-owning people in a different society, that they should own guns on the basis of self-defense, which is kind of mostly insane flat out. It’s not a belief that’s based in reality for the vast majority of gun owners, it’s an idea that’s been marketed to them as a result of a politically funded kind of cottage industry that funds weapons manufacturing in america and abroad.
At the same time, as we’ve seen in this post, this also results in a lot of crazy people with guns, which begets more people with guns in response. A literal arms race, much like we see now with car sizes, where people are convinced they must buy bigger to protect themselves. I can’t really, in good conscience, say that, for example, a black trans woman, that will probably on average live to be like, 30, mostly as a result of hate crimes, shouldn’t own a gun for self-defense. They might not want to own a gun for other reasons, right, like mental health, or not having the ability to really secure it or use it effectively, but I can’t really disagree with them on the basis that they would want to own one for self-defense. I would politically advocate for this not to be the reality in which we have to live, but I can still acknowledge the reality of these sorts, honestly not super uncommon edge cases, while I work against it.
It’s sort of the same frustration I encounter when someone inevitably brings up how, oh, well, they would otherwise take a bike, or have a small shitbox, right, but their kids, really, it’s to protect the children. Really, they live way out in the boonies, and they have 7 children, so of course they need an escalade capable of towing 5 horses. I can’t really argue against that, you know? Most people don’t give a shit about like, what intellectually scales for society at large, they just give a shit about what’s through their own myopic worldview, and I can’t exactly blame people for acting in their own self-interest, even if it ends up being kind of shittier for society at large, or if it ends up just playing into a kind of broader cycle most people aren’t privy too.
I don’t know if exposure to modern gun culture makes people paranoid, or if paranoid people are just drawn to whacking off over their guns. But here they are ruining it for the rest of us. As usual.
Either way, most (all) of us do not have the types of enemies where we need to slink around our own homes strapped all the time, ready to dive under the couch at the slightest bump, rattle, or… ring of the doorbell. Dude. Nobody is out to get you. I promise.
I have an idea: If you don’t want motherfuckers ringing your doorbell, don’t have a doorbell.
Why do they have a doorbell?
Sometimes houses come with them, and threatening murder is easier than properly removing an electrical fixture.
Well… He has a gun and he thinks that its part of a solution. He’s not wrong, he could just shoot the door bell instead of a random visitor and no-one would ring his door bell anymore.
Yeah, but imagine their reaction to a door knock.
Or maybe they’d panic so much they’d shoot themself for fear of what could come next from the big loud boogie man out front.
What about their reaction, when an acorn falls on the floor in front of their door? 🐿️
I can live with that.
Yeah, but imagine their reaction to a door knock.
“Sir, you are punching the main gangway into my abode! Hands in the air!”
So they know who to shoot!
Why have a doorbell?
So he can claim he was terrified for his life when he starts blasting 5 year olds through the oak panels.
He and the guy who did this are in a Facebook group together
If someone doesn’t want another person to use their doorbell…maybe they shouldn’t have a doorbell…
People will knock on the door if there is no bell. I’d say have a doorbell but don’t have it hooked up to anything. Hated when I lived in a place with only a door knocker, would always jump when there was knocking
That version is missing the best part, putting on the powdered wig and shouting "Tally Ho, Lads! " as he blasts the rapscallions apart with the stair-mounted cannon
Why even have the fucking bell then. Sounds like entrapment if you just mean to shooet whomever rings your bell.
Republicans are psychotic. Yes they must be Republican.
There are articles about this incident as the person posting was a public figure.
I also think he died later that year of “natural causes” at home, and that he was actually known for being quite a humanitarian. I remember speculation that he had suffered serious health and especially neurological damage from covid – and no, I don’t believe he was any kind of antimasker or the like. Hopefully I am not mixing up separate events.
If all that’s true, there’s a failure of someone to intervene. We have an altered mental state and threatening someone’s life for a minor nuisance. Someone really needed to see if he was serious and if he was still in a sound enough state to do things like drive or posses deadly weapons.
How would people feel if he really shot a kid for ringing his doorbell? When he warned people ahead of time? Especially if he was later found to have an altered mental state ifrom health issues?
Explanations of bad behavior should not be automatically interpreted as excuses for bad behavior.
This really should be permanently on the “make a comment” page on apps and sites like Lemmy
Signs his own facebook post. This man is 100 years old.
Lmao it’s always mfs like this. He’s gotta have a pfp with the Oakley shades in the driver’s seat of a truck somewhere
With the 5.11 khakis. Betcha he stands with his hands clasped in front, too.
My grandpa writes texts like corporate emails. It’s really silly. He’s like 80 tho
Does anyone ask these psychos why they’re so utterly terrified of everything? He’s basically saying he’s scared of kids at his door. This is not badass tough guy behavior, I don’t care if you’re “not fucking around”, you’re a scared little pissbaby.
When my brother was getting up in arms about LGBTQ books and stuff in schools, this is how I framed it to ridicule him.
“Why do you feel threatened by gay and trans people? Why are you afraid of the LGBTQ?”
Being intolerant and everything, having it framed that way really got under his skin.
Then why does the dude have a doorbell? Oh so it’s a game to him. He wants to shoot kids.
