1.“Federal agencies have the authority to intervene in protests, picket signs, or blockades. The law is impartial: it must be enforced without exception.”

2.“Federal forces are not required to have judicial oversight for their actions.”

3.“Forces are not obligated to consider alternative entrances or pathways. If the main path is blocked, their duty is to clear it.”

4.“This action continues until the flow of traffic is fully restored.”

5.“To carry out these acts, forces will use the minimum necessary force, which is sufficient and proportional to the situation they are addressing.”

6.“Instigators and organizers of the protest will be identified.”

7.“Vehicles used in the protest will be identified and subjected to citations or penalties.”

8.“Data of the instigators, accomplices, participants, and organizers will be transmitted to the authorities through appropriate channels.”

9.“Notices will be sent to the judge in cases of damage, such as burning flags.”

10.“In cases involving minors, relevant authorities will be notified, and the guardians of these youths who bring them to these demonstrations will face sanctions and punishment.”

11.“The costs incurred by security operations will be borne by the responsible organizations or individuals. In cases involving foreigners with provisional residency, information will be forwarded to the National Directorate of Immigration.”

12.“A registry will be created for organizations that participate in these types of actions.”

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    That just means it’s a less viral ideology. It’s a different dimension of something being a joke or not.

    “Tired cliche” is a characteristic of some art or amusement. Facts usually become more, not less solid over time.

    • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Libertarianism is incredibly viral wtf are you talking about lol. A large swathe of us lawmakers, policymakers, senators and other officials are avowed libertarians. The ideology hasn’t been implemented, because every implementation fails. Despite being vastly more represented, funded than any left-wing ideology, and despite being actively promoted by the states in the west, libertarianism is nowhere to be seen in practice, because it is a dog shit idealistic view of how the world functions, and as such, it always collapsed when confronted with material reality. It cannot even manage a single township in a prosperous and peaceful area. This is the best case scenario too, since it otherwise quickly decays into fascism, as we can (once again) see now with Argentina

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        No. Mentioning that word once or twice doesn’t make one libertarian. And most of the time it’s people who’d want to say “liberal” but want to seem smart, or “libertine” but don’t know that word exists.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Ideal libertarianism hasn’t been indeed. Just like ideal communism, which requires statelessness, lack of hierarchy (hence state, military etc) and so on.

            As for less than ideal ones, one can claim Scandinavian countries just as well as socialists sometimes do that. Or maybe Netherlands.

            It’ll be just as good, simply libertarians are usually more modest.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              This is how any ML can tell you were never an ML in any substantial sense. You couldn’t even use “Dictatorship of the Proletariat” in a sentence

            • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Lmao the scandinavian countries aren’t socialist or even approaching it. Neither is the Netherlands. How can you know this little?
              What the scandinavian countries have is the (now remnants) of a somewhat powerful union movement. This organised labour force managed to negotiate consessions and to get those codified into law. Since the 90’s the welfare state has been slowly eroded, and the quality drastically plummeting, as the current neoliberal regime gets more and more influential. You would know this if you cared to study the things you claim to have knowledge of.