• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    Turning that into a law is ridiculous - you really can’t consider that more than advisory unless you enforce it with technical means. For example, maybe put it behind a login or captcha if you want only humans to see it

    • Kairos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Are you aware of what “unlisted” means?

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Yes, and there’s also no law against calling an unlisted phone number

        Also we already had this battle with robots.txt. In the beginning, search engines wouldn’t honor it either because they wanted the competitive advantage of more info, and websites trusted it too much and tried to wall off too much info that way.

        There were complaints, bad pr, lawsuits, call for a law

        It’s no longer the Wild West:

        • search engines are mature and generally honor robots.txt
        • websites use rate limiting to conserve resources and user logins to fence off data there’s a reason to fence off
        • truce: neither side is as greedy
        • there is no such law nor is that reasonable
        • Kairos
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s also no law against visiting an unlisted webpage? What?