• KittyBobo [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    That always bugged me with the Pokémon defense. “Oh, but they like that im the master and tell them to do things. We’re all friends, just a big family!” Is the exact argument you would use if you were subjugating others but didn’t want to feel bad about it.

            • BovineUniversity [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Why should animals be forced to live within your limits though, even if you treat them ‘well’? You’re trapping them in homes or even cages, they have basically no agency.

              • WithoutFurtherBelay@hexbear.net
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Because if they get outside they’ll get killed by a car and/or fuck up the environment

                Pets SHOULDN’T exist, but that isn’t fixable by having individuals throw “their” animals outside, it doesn’t fix anything and causes more suffering

                So I’m not “against pets” any more than someone is “against food” because they got it from a capitalist grocery store

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          We co-evolved with dogs over the course of 40,000 years. in so far as the temr “natural” means anything, it is natural for dogs and humans to live together in close cooperation. there’s a theory going that humans and dogs (and domesticated agricultural plants) co-domesticated each other and that our close relationship with dogs (and wheat) is why humans seem to share many traits found in domesticated animals but not wild animals.