I’m personally crossing my fingers for Discord.

  • kalleboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem with anything video is still that it costs way too much to host, unless you’re a giant who already has their own data centers and massive data pipes. You can’t just throw it on a cheap VPS like text-based services

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you thinking of it as a centralized replacement to YouTube? If you’re centralized, yeah, you probably need a data centre the size of Malta. There are decentralized alternatives (like PeerTube) where the cost is also distributed. If you’re using PeerTube, you literally can “just throw it on a cheap VPS”, and lots of people do, with no problems.

      I think the real reason decentralized video isn’t going to catch on is because video (and YouTube in particular) has not been a community thing for many years now. There are very few YouTubers who make videos to build a community or connect to a community. YouTubers are on there for money, and there’s really no alternative that can both host the videos and pay out big cheques to content creators.

          • Pēteris Krišjānis@toot.lv
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            @duncesplayed imho making PeerTube or other Fediverse video service very good at UX and easy to use will allow these communities migrate when they feel like it.
            I think biggest issue might be running video service like this and having running costs for video storage, etc. As always, communities might be willing to factor those costs in their pledges.
            I think PeerTube needs easy to use setup / reliable network of hosters, and good UX to manage community, live streams, chats, etc.