• RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There needs to be a decent charge/punishment absolutely, but harsher punishment will not stop this.
    The monopoly of violence lies with the government and they need to treat that with much more tact and finesse than they currently do in the US. No knock raids, SWAT teams filled with former veterans trained to kill by the military are employed without hesitation, this is wrong. The responsibility lies with the government and law enforcement to be more careful and know what they are getting into before even considering employing deadly force.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      10 months ago

      I know a bunch of vets that swear that police rules of engagement are insane and they would have gotten in deep shit for acting in a fucking war zone the way cops do here.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        This, if swat teams and police raids weren’t as violent and deadly as they are, swatting would cease to be a thing in the first place.

        Shithead trolls would lose a tool to harass.

      • skulblaka@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        For one thing, opening fire on a civilian or other non-combatant that hasn’t already fired live rounds at you will get your ass court-martialed, dishonorably discharged, and imprisoned faster than you can say “Miranda rights”

        And somehow that happens dozens of times per day in American police departments

    • Kairos
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Didn’t Biden make no-knock raids illegal?

        • Kairos
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The fed can regulate any armed forces as per the second amendment. And “no duty to protect” means they’re not constitutionally obliged to stop crimes.