Globally, only one in 50 new cars were fully electric in 2020, and one in 14 in the UK. Sounds impressive, but even if all new cars were electric now, it would still take 15-20 years to replace the world’s fossil fuel car fleet.

The emission savings from replacing all those internal combustion engines with zero-carbon alternatives will not feed in fast enough to make the necessary difference in the time we can spare: the next five years. Tackling the climate and air pollution crises requires curbing all motorised transport, particularly private cars, as quickly as possible. Focusing solely on electric vehicles is slowing down the race to zero emissions.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah I actually made a mistake originally, I got the locations mixed up, my apologies.

    But I personally don’t think Finland is a big enough example, at just 5 million, it’s a different ball game.

    Having said that, I fully support my country (Canada) spending more money on infrastructure including better bike paths, but I have doubts it would work as well as Finland, we have way more suburbs.

    • Devorlon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I had this big comment, but just as I posted it my internet died. TLD±RW

      I agree suburbs are hard to redevelop, we refocus cities to work for the people living in them, give suburbanites trains to cities and restrict cars. Which frees up space to allow for better winter cycle infrastructure.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I agree with that. I think we are way more behind in terms of good trains and public transportation. Better bike paths would help but if people still need cars to commute from an hour away cause there is no train and houses are expensive downtown, your city centre would still be a giant parking lot.