While Education and Organizing is building the parts for a new engine the rest of the year.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    That didn’t exactly answer the question. If Democrats consistently get all the power, why would they bother changing? Don’t they already have what they want?

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe we can ask that when they actually do get all the power, because they’ve consistently lacked the majority needed to do any worthwhile changes.

    • Shazbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Speaking for myself, voting for down ballot candidates is the first step towards changing a party. My home city secured a progressive majority in 2022, and previous elected progressives are now running for higher offices. It’s always a process, and when done right provides better changes for the years to come.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can’t expect people to put in more than 30 minutes to an hour one day every four years. That would be ridiculous!

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Dems haven’t bothered changing even when they lose power. Part of the reason we are in this mess. They most go left or wither on the blue dog vine.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Democrats aren’t a monolithic entity that wants to gorge itself on power and then sit around fat and happy. It’s a bunch of competing politicians who are constantly at risk of losing their seat - if not to Republicans, then, as in Cali, to fellow Democrats who propose a different line.