Jordan117@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoOklahoma bill would require 'furries' be picked up from school by parents, animal controlwww.oklahoman.comexternal-linkmessage-square258fedilinkarrow-up1634arrow-down115cross-posted to: conservative@lemm.eeinterestingshare@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1619arrow-down1external-linkOklahoma bill would require 'furries' be picked up from school by parents, animal controlwww.oklahoman.comJordan117@lemmy.world to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square258fedilinkcross-posted to: conservative@lemm.eeinterestingshare@lemmy.zip
minus-squareFurbag@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·10 months ago But saying there isn’t a sexual aspect about it, is not true. Bruh, take anything and you can probably find a sexual aspect about it. There’s a sexual aspect about Sports Illustrated. I’m not going to turn around and say everyone who subscribes to Sports Illustrated is a pervert.
minus-squareAutistoMephisto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-210 months agoFacts. I mean, I know I don’t need to, but I’m going to quote Rule 34 in its entirety: If it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions. Take anything and I guarantee you, someone, somewhere, has sexualized it. And if not, there is Rule 35, which states If there is no porn of it, porn of it will be made. Some can interpret this as, “If you discover that something has no porn, you have a responsibility to make it.”
Bruh, take anything and you can probably find a sexual aspect about it.
There’s a sexual aspect about Sports Illustrated. I’m not going to turn around and say everyone who subscribes to Sports Illustrated is a pervert.
Facts. I mean, I know I don’t need to, but I’m going to quote Rule 34 in its entirety:
Take anything and I guarantee you, someone, somewhere, has sexualized it. And if not, there is Rule 35, which states
Some can interpret this as, “If you discover that something has no porn, you have a responsibility to make it.”