cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1927197

Hey everyone, check the Linguist

  • you can translate texts offline (with sent no one single byte to a Google and stay private)
  • a lot of features and flexible configuration
  • dictionary + history for learn languages
  • it is are hackable - you can write code to use your own translation service
  • OrdinaryAlien@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You write a description for your application in a language you are not confident in. You are aware you could have made errors, yet you don’t take the time to check it with a grammar checker. It’s a simple process and takes seconds.

    I’d like to point out again that language mistakes have been made in a language-related application. Constructive criticism is fine. The developer will learn from his mistakes.
    At least it’s a marketing mistake. People who use poor grammar are not typically taken seriously.

    “I find it more compelling to read such a description in obviously non-native English…”

    Not everyone agrees, that’s subjective.

    • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a simple process and takes seconds.

      You have access to the text. Start a stopwatch. Edit the text using grammar-checking software. Post it somewhere on the web, fully-formatted and suitable for marketing purposes. Stop the stopwatch. Publish how long it took you.

      We’ll review your work.

      “I find it more compelling to read such a description in obviously non-native English…”

      Not everyone agrees, that’s subjective.

      Yes. This whole thread is subjective. And?