Furball@sh.itjust.works to sh.itjust.works Main Community@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years agoDoes anyone know why we’re defederated from beehaw.org?i.imgur.comimagemessage-square181linkfedilinkarrow-up1205arrow-down114
arrow-up1191arrow-down1imageDoes anyone know why we’re defederated from beehaw.org?i.imgur.comFurball@sh.itjust.works to sh.itjust.works Main Community@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square181linkfedilink
minus-squareTurtleTourParty@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 years agoAccording to your tool no one has defederated Midwest.Social.
minus-squareNerd02@lemmy.basedcount.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoSure looks like it. Is that not the case? I’m not familiar with your instance.
minus-squareTurtleTourParty@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 years agoI don’t know, I just figured someone would have. I guess we’re just a flyover instance.
minus-squareThe Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoIts one of the best run instances in the federation tbh. And it has a clear purpose of scope which means it doesn’t get as overwhelmed as a general purpose instance
According to your tool no one has defederated Midwest.Social.
Sure looks like it. Is that not the case? I’m not familiar with your instance.
I don’t know, I just figured someone would have. I guess we’re just a flyover instance.
Its one of the best run instances in the federation tbh. And it has a clear purpose of scope which means it doesn’t get as overwhelmed as a general purpose instance