ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 year agoExperts: No Way to Truly Know if Redditor You're Arguing With Is Bot or Childhard-drive.netexternal-linkmessage-square125linkfedilinkarrow-up1743arrow-down114
arrow-up1729arrow-down1external-linkExperts: No Way to Truly Know if Redditor You're Arguing With Is Bot or Childhard-drive.netZeroCool@slrpnk.net to The Onion@midwest.socialEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square125linkfedilink
minus-squarePossible_EmuWrangler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoI wonder what Alan Turing would think of this.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoHe’d be too busy shitposting on Tumblr as King of the Gay Pirates
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoLet me ask the Alan Turing chatbot…
minus-squareMeowoem@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoProbably be too busy in the garden looking at flowers, or too fascinated by the complexity of the emerging properties of neural networks and things.
minus-squaretryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoAny AI smart enough to pass a turing test would also be smart enough to fail it on purpose.
I wonder what Alan Turing would think of this.
He’d be too busy shitposting on Tumblr as King of the Gay Pirates
Let me ask the Alan Turing chatbot…
Probably be too busy in the garden looking at flowers, or too fascinated by the complexity of the emerging properties of neural networks and things.
Any AI smart enough to pass a turing test would also be smart enough to fail it on purpose.