• BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s an oversimplified anarchist talking point against authoritarianism and the state. It’s noting the similarities between conservative talking points and auth-left socialist rhetoric. Basically, almost everything you criticize about capitalism can be applied to the state. And defenses for the state from auth-left socialists sounds an awful lot like right wing talking points in defense of capitalism/imperialism/insertotherismhere. Not to mention, the USSR was pretty socially conservative and that’s a big mark against them imo. Liberatory politics should liberate people, after all

    • freehugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Leftists who think, if I don’t subscribe to their narrow, personal definition of leftism, I must be an epistemically evil conservative maniac with no middle ground whatsoever.

      • cubedsteaks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        what I hate is that when I say I’m not affiliated with a political party - people try to assume I must be a fucking centrist and therefor secretly conservative.

        Those people have some kind of mental deficiency that prevents them from thinking outside of what they already know. It’s sad really. It’s like their brain can’t comprehend anything outside of what they were told to think.

    • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can sort of see where they’re coming from, if they’re equating authoritarianism to conservatism and libertarianism to liberalism. But in reality, Stalin was a left wing authoritarian.

      • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we look at the rhetoric, the soviet state was certainly left wing, but the main policy was state capitalism. To my mind, state capitalism is not a right wing (favors private control of industry) nor a left wing (favors worker control of industry) policy.

        This is definitely a case where pure left/right dichotomy doesn’t serve to accurately describe the situation on the ground.

          • cubedsteaks
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I remember only learning about it recently and being like “oh shit, so that’s what’s going on”

          • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s better than the alternative, though it does leave me with a second question. If the far left and the far right resemble each other, can they be hybridized to make a kind of antichthon version of the center?

            • cubedsteaks
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I wanna know what we call the opposite of the left and right that are merging. Those two groups are now one - what’s the group that goes up against them both?