Will people here use/try Meta’s #threads when available? Would love to know the reasons or if it would be just for fun/curiosity.

The amount of data collected is insane imo.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Definitely not. I didn’t come to the Fediverse to be under social media companies again.

  • RomanRoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    People on Twitter are already trying it because Twitter has been shit.

    Someone in my circle created their account and already deleted it. Their explanation was a FAQ screenshot for Threads saying that it doesn’t matter who you follow or who follows you, the algorithm will show or hide things from you based on what they think you will enjoy and there’s no way around it and you also can’t sort by new.

    I mean, are companies really paying attention to user needs? Lol

    • alnilam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve stopped using LinkedIn because it keeps defaulting to Relevant instead of Recent, and Relevant apparently means posts from 2 weeks ago. But at least there you can manually set it to Recent every time.

      A social medium where sorting by Recent is impossible will be a no-go.

      • scottywh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My current issue with LinkedIn is that they’re trying so hard to force me to use their app on mobile.

        The latest way is that they’re no longer allowing you to do the “easy apply” from mobile without their app.

        I don’t want the damn app though. There’s no good reason to lock features that work fine on a desktop browser away from mobile users unless they install the app.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, are companies really paying attention to user needs? Lol

      I often wonder if these are the result of some middle-manager just doing things to justify their job. Like website redesigns most of the time feel like someone needed to justify their job. It’s almost always worse than the old design. How can you take what you had and then “improve” it by making it worse?

    • blazarious@mylem.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, are companies really paying attention to user needs? Lol

      Look, the user needs to see stuff that keeps them engaged. That keeps them coming back for more. Algos are designed to achieve exactly that. Your self chosen bubble of followings and interests may not be optimized for engagement and addiction.

      No, the companies don’t pay attention to user needs, they pay attention to the bottom line.

  • ehrenschwan@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    The amount of data collected is so insane that it won’t come out in the EU for now. And I like it that way.

    • Kaldo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t have to come to EU to get this data though, all it has to do is start federating. I’m really curious how is that all going to work out, legally speaking.

      • C_M@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not totally true, the real value is combining data from different sources, but since the data they get wont have your email /ip/device/contacts etc it will be a lot harder to harvest usefully for advertising. Maybe they will figure out things to use it, but what they can use is already quite public, so they don’t really need to federatie for that

  • M4775@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    No! - I’m not a dumbfuck. Mark Zuckerberg once said people who trust him with their personal information are dumbfucks. I have never had an account on any of his platforms, and never will. If something I’m using integrated with his products I’d just stop using it. Just no!

    • cestvrai@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, we’re kind of stuck with WhatsApp where I live but I Signal with the willing.

      Otherwise, I avoid Facebook products like the plague.

      • Rannoch@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know anything about the number of users they’re expecting to have with this, but I’ll be very surprised if it’s a significant number. I just don’t get why anyone would want to join it, not only for what it is, but also for the whole facebook/meta nonsense. But I suppose some folks still actively and frequently use Facebook, so what do I know!

  • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Everything I don’t like about twitter combined with everything I don’t like about Facebook? hard pass.

    • Javish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This. To quote Friar Tuck from ROBIN HOOD PRINCE OF THIEVES: “I’d rather roast in hell.”

  • Rannoch@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t see any reason for me to ever try it. I’ve got plenty of social media to deal with already, and this doesn’t seem to be offering anything new or interesting for me. Plus the creepy permissions even keep me away from joining temporarily out of any curiosity I might have.