People need to realize you can use alternatives

  • Drew Got No Clue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one is saying that the US is good though.

    Exactly because of what you said in your last paragraph, some don’t want to use an instance run by people with a certain political agenda.

    • mrmanagerA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think its a mistake.

      We already divided the earth into countries, and now we are supposed to divide ourselves in the fediverse also because we cant stand eachothers opinins?

      • Jeremy [Iowa]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you seriously pretending things such as

        “actually no one was killed at tiananmen square and if anyone was it was soldiers who were killed by those unruly students and not the other way around.”

        are mere opinion?

        • dingus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see this often in debate topics. Some people seem to think that every opinion is valid and worth listening to when no, I’m sorry, that really isn’t the case. There is no need to casually try to debate people who don’t believe the existence of the literal sun, or holocaust deniers, or those who think all gay people should be euthanized.

          It’s a bit of a pet peeve of mine tbh, and I’ve always run into issues like this on discussion boards, especially of the past. Those with blatantly offensive and wrong viewpoints get bitchy when others don’t want their debate topics present because every opinion can be respectfully debated. No. Yes…often two opposing viewpoints can be valid. But other times, they most certainly are not. If you’re of the opinion that child porn should be accepted for example, it doesn’t matter how “respectfully” you try to present it and yourself. Your view is wrong and you do NOT deserve a platform to speak about it.

        • mrmanagerA
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          My point is, we shouldnt act like little fighters here on the fediverse, not when there are so much positive things to focus on.

      • Wigglet@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personally I don’t think tolerating intolerance is just a differing opinion. I feel like excusing genocide puts them in a group of people i don’t want to associate and I don’t think an “opinion” like denying genocide should be sat at the same table as reality.

        Don’t mince my words, I hate all imperialistic governments who commit genocide and if there were posts about the US never having intentionally killed all the buffalo, trail of tears, those culture stripping schools etc or our own version of those schools here in Aotearoa I would be just as disgusted.

      • Drew Got No Clue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are not supposed to do anything.

        Everyone is free to join any instance they think it’s good. We can communicate freely (bar a few exceptions) throughout the fediverse, so it’s not dividing users. Furthermore, lemmy.ml is overloaded, so that’s a good reason to choose another instance. The admins themselves don’t expect the majority to join that server as the primary one (they run it as the ‘flagship instance’).