• BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Ok then you are free to die of hunger if you are homeless but don’t do it in a public place… good…

    What’s the point of that rethoric? If you didn’t see someone homeless dying of hunger in a public place like streets then the problem it’s solved and people like that didn’t exist?

    Welcome to the land of the free…

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      What’s the point of that rethoric?

      It’s black humor.

      He’s pointing out that lots of people don’t seem to have a problem with homeless people dying. They just have a problem with homeless people dying visibly in the streets instead of invisibly somewhere else. Or, even worse, actually addressing the causes of homelessness like building enough housing so the rent isn’t too damn high.

      • BlackSkinnedJew@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah I understand the black humor, what I didn’t understand it’s the rethoric of it, I mean what’s the whole point into letting people die of hunger but stopping them of being seen? A whole non-sense fascist rethoric?

        Edit: IDK if it’s just me but it’s something evilish don’t you believe?