• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    He intended to crash a vehicle. Vehicles are commonly viewed as deadly weapons when used as one. It is not a stretch what so ever.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, I just do not believe cops what so ever. At least the angry pigs that love throwing their undeserved power around.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t trust them either, and I have plenty of personal experience to back that. Experience going back decades, when they were far worse.

          Back to attempted murder, that’s ludicrous. Cop fucked up and crashed, for whatever reason. They try to get away from responsibility by raising a fuss. Been there, done that. I can tell stories all night.

    • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      He intended to crash a vehicle.

      That’s not the same as intent to kill someone. Murder requires intent, without that it becomes manslaughter

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I think it’d depend. There are degrees of murder. You can ABSOLUTELY get charged with murder if someone dies due to extreme reckless neglegence in some jurisdictions.

        It’s kinda’ exactly why Derek Chauvin is in jail. He never intended to kill anyone, but he was so insanely reckless and careless. He was found guilty of BOTH lesser degrees of murder and manslaughter.

        For a more direct example, just look up all the street racers that get charged with murder.

        • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Unintentional second degree murder is Minnesota’s version of felony murder. Felony murder does not require intent.

          Third degree murder in Minnesota requires a “depraved mind” which the example from this story wouldn’t meet.

          Edit: As a resident of Minnesota who studied the laws in both my Criminal Code and Criminal Law and Procedure classes, the incident from this article would not meet requirements for murder charges.

    • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      So if I decide to crash into a tree, do I get charged with attempted murder?

      Even in cases of reckless driving, the charge is manslaughter, proving murder is gonna be hard unless there’s evidence of premeditation

      • Neato@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Deciding to crash into a person is attempted murder. People live in houses.

        • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          They crashed into a place of business (as said in the article) at 1230am. No people are around shops at that time.

          Your argument would never stand in court.

          • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It was a bar so it’s very likely there were people around but it would still be hard to prove intent to kill.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Is that why the owner and others were still in the building? You’re literally making shit up that doesn’t even apply here.